Sharpton Suzanne R, Feng Sandy, Hameed Bilal, Yao Francis, Lai Jennifer C
1 Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 2 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 3 Address correspondence to: Jennifer C. Lai, M.D., M.B.A., 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-357, Box 0538, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Transplantation. 2014 Sep 15;98(5):557-62. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000090.
The proportion of older patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) is rising. Although increased age and LT-MELD are known to increase the risk of graft loss, no studies have explored whether there is a synergistic effect between LT-age and LT-MELD.
All US adult, non-Status 1 recipients of primary deceased donor LT from 2/05 to 1/10 without MELD exceptions were included (n=15,677). Recipients were categorized by LT-age [18-59 yr (n=11,966), 60-64 yr (n=2181), 65-69 yr (n=1177), and ≥70 yr (n=343)] and LT-MELD [low (<20, n=5290), mid (20-27, n=5112), and high (≥28, n=5265)]. Adjusted Cox models evaluated the independent and combined effects of LT-age and LT-MELD on graft loss (death or re-LT).
LT-age ≥70 yr (HR=1.65, 95% CI 1.08-1.82) and LT-MELD ≥28 (HR=1.46, 95% CI 1.02-1.47) were independently associated with increased risk of graft loss (P<0.001). In a model allowing for the interaction between LT-age and LT-MELD, the risk of graft loss for recipients ≥70 years with MELD ≥28 was higher than predicted by the additive model (HR=2.38, 95% CI 1.73-3.27, P<0.001) resulting in 1-year graft survival of 56%. However, the increased risk of graft loss in recipients ≥70 years was attenuated at lower LT-MELD <28. Furthermore, the interaction term was not significant for any other LT-age and LT-MELD combination.
Our analyses suggest that recipients should not be excluded solely based on age; however, LT for recipients ≥70 years at high LT-MELD scores should be undertaken cautiously.
等待肝移植(LT)的老年患者比例正在上升。尽管已知年龄增长和肝移植终末期肝病模型(LT-MELD)评分升高会增加移植物丢失的风险,但尚无研究探讨LT年龄和LT-MELD之间是否存在协同效应。
纳入2005年2月至2010年1月期间所有美国成年、非1类状态的原发性脑死亡供体肝移植受者,且无MELD例外情况(n = 15677)。根据LT年龄[18 - 59岁(n = 11966)、60 - 64岁(n = 2181)、65 - 69岁(n = 1177)和≥70岁(n = 343)]以及LT-MELD[低(<20,n = 5290)、中(20 - 27,n = 5112)和高(≥28,n = 5265)]对受者进行分类。调整后的Cox模型评估LT年龄和LT-MELD对移植物丢失(死亡或再次肝移植)的独立和联合影响。
LT年龄≥70岁(HR = 1.65,95%CI 1.08 - 1.82)和LT-MELD≥28(HR = 1.46,95%CI 1.02 - 1.47)与移植物丢失风险增加独立相关(P < 0.001)。在一个允许LT年龄和LT-MELD之间相互作用的模型中,MELD≥28的≥70岁受者的移植物丢失风险高于相加模型预测的风险(HR = 2.38,9%CI 1.73 - 3.27,P < 0.001),导致1年移植物存活率为56%。然而,在较低的LT-MELD < 28时,≥70岁受者移植物丢失风险的增加有所减弱。此外,对于任何其他LT年龄和LT-MELD组合,相互作用项均不显著。
我们的分析表明,不应仅基于年龄排除受者;然而,对于LT-MELD评分高的≥70岁受者进行肝移植应谨慎进行。