*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; and ‡Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 20;39(12):E713-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000326.
Retrospective study.
To determine the frequency of facet arthrosis according to age, sex, and cervical level. In addition, we propose and evaluate a new grading system for cervical facet degeneration.
Cervical facets can play an important role in symptomatology. However, there is only one computed tomographic grading system for cervical facet joints.
From January 2003 to January 2012, 1944 patients underwent computed tomography of the cervical spine in our institution. We randomly selected 40 males and 40 females from each of the following age groups: 40 to 49, 50 to 59, 60 to 69, and 70 to 79, such that we had a total of 320 patients. We then graded the degree of arthrosis of the facet joints from C2 to C7 on the axial, sagittal, or coronal images according to 4 grades. These categories were: grade I, normal; grade II, degenerative changes including joint space narrowing, cyst formation, small osteophytes without joint hypertrophy seen; grade III, facet joint hypertrophy from large osteophytes without fusion; and grade IV, bony fusion of the facet joint. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities for the grading system were calculated using reliability statistics by intraclass correlation.
Facet arthrosis is common with older patients and at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. Facet arthrosis was more common on the left side and in males. Greater than grade III facet joint arthrosis was common in patients older than 60 and at C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5. The reliability statistics by intraclass correlation for the grading system was 0.878 for the intraobserver reliability and 0.869 for the interobserver reliability.
It seems that upper cervical levels are more likely to degenerate and to have more advanced degrees of degeneration than the lower cervical levels. As expected, age correlates with worsening degeneration. The proposed computed tomographic grading system for cervical facet arthrosis seemed to be reliable.
回顾性研究。
确定颈椎小关节骨关节炎的发生频率与年龄、性别和颈椎节段的关系。此外,我们提出并评估了一种新的颈椎小关节退变分级系统。
颈椎小关节在症状学中可能起重要作用。然而,目前仅有一个用于颈椎小关节的计算机断层扫描(CT)分级系统。
2003 年 1 月至 2012 年 1 月,我院共对 1944 例患者行颈椎 CT 检查。我们从每个年龄组(40-49 岁、50-59 岁、60-69 岁和 70-79 岁)中随机选择 40 名男性和 40 名女性,总计 320 名患者。然后,我们根据 4 个等级,在轴位、矢状位和冠状位图像上对 C2 到 C7 的小关节退变程度进行分级。这些等级包括:I 级,正常;II 级,退行性改变,包括关节间隙变窄、囊形成、小的骨赘但无关节肥大;III 级,小关节肥大伴大的骨赘但无融合;IV 级,小关节骨融合。采用组内相关系数的可靠性统计方法计算分级系统的组内和组间可信度。
颈椎小关节骨关节炎在老年患者和 C2-C3、C3-C4 和 C4-C5 更为常见。左侧和男性小关节骨关节炎更常见。60 岁以上和 C2-C3、C3-C4 和 C4-C5 患者的关节退变更严重,III 级以上小关节骨关节炎更常见。分级系统的组内可信度的组内相关系数为 0.878,组间可信度的组内相关系数为 0.869。
似乎颈椎上部比下部更容易退变,且退变程度更严重。与预期一致,年龄与退变加重相关。所提出的颈椎小关节骨关节炎 CT 分级系统似乎是可靠的。