Mishra N N, Bhatia Triptish, Kumar Nandini, Nimgaonkar Vishwajit L, Parker Lisa S, Deshpande Smita N
Department of Psychiatry, PGIMER-Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Med Res. 2014 Feb;139(2):246-51.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Mental health professionals have varied attitudes and views regarding informed consent and confidentiality protections in psychiatric research and clinical care. The present study was designed to understand the knowledge and views of mental health professionals (MHPs) regarding informed consent and confidentiality protection practices.
Mental health professionals (n=121) who were members of the Delhi Psychiatric Society, were invited to participate in this questionnaire-based study of their knowledge and attitudes regarding informed consent and confidentiality. Half of them expressed willingness to discuss participation and gave initial oral consent (n=62); of these, 31 gave written informed consent to participate and completed the questionnaires. The questionnaires included both forced choice (yes / no / do not know) and open-ended questions. Questionnaires content reflected prominent guidelines on informed consent and confidentiality protection.
Attitudes of the majority of the participants towards informed consent and confidentiality were in line with ethical principles and guidelines. All expressed the opinion that confidentiality should generally be respected and that if confidentiality was breached, there could be mistrust of the professional by the patient/participant. The mean knowledge scores regarding informed consent and confidentiality were 8.55 ± 1.46 and 8.16 ± 1.29, respectively.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The participating mental health professionals appeared to have adequate knowledge of basic ethical guidelines concerning informed consent and confidentiality. Most respondents were aware of ethical issues in research. Given the small sample size and low response rate, the significance of the quantitative analysis must be regarded with modesty, and qualitative analysis of open-ended questions may be more valuable for development of future research. Increased efforts to involve mental health professionals in research on ethical concerns pertinent to their work must be made, and the actual practices of these professionals with regard to ethical guidelines need to be studied.
心理健康专业人员在精神病学研究和临床护理中的知情同意和保密保护方面有着不同的态度和观点。本研究旨在了解心理健康专业人员(MHPs)对知情同意和保密保护实践的知识和观点。
邀请德里精神病学会的心理健康专业人员(n = 121)参与这项基于问卷的研究,了解他们对知情同意和保密的知识与态度。其中一半表示愿意讨论参与并给予初步口头同意(n = 62);在这些人中,31人给予书面知情同意参与并完成了问卷。问卷包括强制选择(是/否/不知道)和开放式问题。问卷内容反映了关于知情同意和保密保护的主要指南。
大多数参与者对知情同意和保密的态度符合伦理原则和指南。所有人都表示,一般应尊重保密原则,如果违反保密规定,患者/参与者可能会对专业人员失去信任。关于知情同意和保密的平均知识得分分别为8.55±1.46和8.16±1.29。
参与研究的心理健康专业人员似乎对有关知情同意和保密的基本伦理指南有足够的了解。大多数受访者意识到研究中的伦理问题。鉴于样本量小和回复率低,定量分析的意义必须谨慎看待,对开放式问题的定性分析可能对未来研究的开展更有价值。必须加大力度让心理健康专业人员参与与其工作相关的伦理问题研究,并且需要研究这些专业人员在伦理指南方面的实际做法。