Suppr超能文献

基于接纳与正念的认知行为疗法

[Acceptance and mindfulness-based cognitive-behavioral therapies].

作者信息

Ngô Thanh-Lan

机构信息

Université de Montréal; Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal.

出版信息

Sante Ment Que. 2013 Autumn;38(2):35-63. doi: 10.7202/1023989ar.

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the main approaches in psychotherapy. It teaches the patient to examine the link between dysfunctional thoughts and maladaptive behaviors and to re- evaluate the cognitive biases involved in the maintenance of symptoms by using strategies such as guided discovery. CBT is constantly evolving in part to improve its' effectiveness and accessibility. Thus in the last decade, increasingly popular approaches based on mindfulness and acceptance have emerged. These therapies do not attempt to modify cognitions even when they are biased and dysfunctional but rather seek a change in the relationship between the individual and the symptoms. This article aims to present the historical context that has allowed the emergence of this trend, the points of convergence and divergence with traditional CBT as well as a brief presentation of the different therapies based on mindfulness meditation and acceptance. Hayes (2004) described three successive waves in behavior therapy, each characterized by "dominant assumptions, methods and goals": traditional behavior therapy, cognitive therapy and therapies based on mindfulness meditation and acceptance. The latter consider that human suffering occurs when the individual lives a restricted life in order avoid pain and immediate discomfort to the detriment of his global wellbeing. These therapies combine mindfulness, experiential, acceptance strategies with traditional behavior principles in order to attain lasting results. There are significant points of convergence between traditional CBT and therapies based on mindfulness meditation and acceptance. They are both empirically validated, based upon a theoretical model postulating that avoidance is key in the maintenance of psychopathology and they recommend an approach strategy in order to overcome the identified problem. They both use behavioral techniques in the context of a collaborative relationship in order to identify precise problems and to achieve specific goals. They focus on the present moment rather than on historical causes. However, they also present significant differences: control vs acceptance of thoughts, focus on cognition vs behavior, focus on the relationship between the individual and his thoughts vs cognitive content, goal of modifying dysfunctional beliefs vs metacognitive processes, use of experiential vs didactic methods, focus on symptoms vs quality of life, strategies used before vs after the unfolding of full emotional response. The main interventions based on mindfulness meditation and acceptance are: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Functional Analytic Therapy, the expanded model of Behavioral Activation, Metacognitive Therapy, Mindfulness based Cognitive Therapy, Dialectic Behavior Therapy, Integrative Behavioral Couples Therapy and Compassionate Mind Training. These are described in this article. They offer concepts and techniques which might enhance therapeutic efficacy. They teach a new way to deploy attention and to enter into a relationship with current experience (for example, defusion) in order to diminish cognitive reactivity, a maintenance factor for psychopathology, and to enhance psychological flexibility. The focus on cognitive process, metacognition as well as cognitive content might yield additional benefits in therapy. It is possible to combine traditional CBT with third wave approaches by using psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring in the beginning phases of therapy in order to establish thought bias and to then encourage acceptance of internal experiences as well as exposure to feared stimuli rather than to continue to use cognitive restructuring techniques. Traditional CBT and third wave approaches seem to impact different processes: the former enhance the capacity to observe and describe experiences and the latter diminish experiential avoidance and increase conscious action as well as acceptance. The identification of personal values helps to motivate the individual to undertake actions required in order to enhance quality of life. In the case of chronic illness, it diminishes suffering by increasing acceptance. Although the evidence base supporting the efficacy of third wave approaches is less robust than in the case of traditional cognitive or behavior therapy, therapies based on mindfulness meditation and acceptance are promising interventions that might help to elucidate change process and offer complementary strategies in order to help patients.

摘要

认知行为疗法(CBT)是心理治疗的主要方法之一。它教导患者审视功能失调的思维与适应不良行为之间的联系,并通过诸如引导发现等策略,重新评估维持症状的认知偏差。CBT一直在不断发展,部分原因是为了提高其有效性和可及性。因此,在过去十年中,基于正念和接纳的方法越来越流行。这些疗法即使在认知存在偏差和功能失调时也不试图改变它们,而是寻求个体与症状之间关系的改变。本文旨在介绍促成这一趋势出现的历史背景、与传统CBT的异同点,以及对基于正念冥想和接纳的不同疗法的简要介绍。海斯(2004年)描述了行为疗法中的三个连续浪潮,每个浪潮都以“主导假设、方法和目标”为特征:传统行为疗法、认知疗法以及基于正念冥想和接纳的疗法。后者认为,当个体为了避免痛苦和即时不适而过着受限的生活,从而损害其整体幸福感时,人类的痛苦就会发生。这些疗法将正念、体验式、接纳策略与传统行为原则相结合,以获得持久的效果。传统CBT与基于正念冥想和接纳的疗法之间存在显著的相同点。它们都经过实证验证,基于一种理论模型,该模型假定回避是心理病理学维持的关键,并且它们都推荐一种应对策略来克服所确定的问题。它们都在合作关系的背景下使用行为技术,以识别确切的问题并实现特定的目标。它们关注当下而非历史原因。然而,它们也存在显著差异:对思维的控制与接纳、关注认知与行为、关注个体与他的思维之间的关系与认知内容、改变功能失调信念的目标与元认知过程、使用体验式方法与说教式方法、关注症状与生活质量、在完整情绪反应展开之前与之后使用的策略。基于正念冥想和接纳的主要干预措施包括:接纳与承诺疗法、功能分析疗法、行为激活的扩展模型、元认知疗法、基于正念的认知疗法、辩证行为疗法、综合行为夫妻疗法和慈悲心训练。本文将对这些进行描述。它们提供了可能提高治疗效果的概念和技术。它们教导一种新的方式来分配注意力,并与当前体验建立联系(例如,解离),以减少认知反应性,这是心理病理学的一个维持因素,并提高心理灵活性。对认知过程、元认知以及认知内容的关注可能会在治疗中产生额外的益处。在治疗的初始阶段,可以通过使用心理教育和认知重构来结合传统CBT与第三浪潮方法,以确立思维偏差,然后鼓励接纳内部体验以及暴露于恐惧刺激,而不是继续使用认知重构技术。传统CBT和第三浪潮方法似乎影响不同的过程:前者提高观察和描述体验的能力,而后者减少体验性回避并增加有意识的行动以及接纳。识别个人价值观有助于激励个体采取提高生活质量所需的行动。在慢性病的情况下,它通过增加接纳来减轻痛苦。尽管支持第三浪潮方法有效性的证据基础不如传统认知或行为疗法那样坚实,但基于正念冥想和接纳的疗法是有前景的干预措施,可能有助于阐明改变过程并提供补充策略以帮助患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验