Salarifar Mojtaba, Mousavi Mehdi, Yousefpour Narges, Nematipour Ebrahim, Kassaian Seyed Ebrahim, Poorhosseini Hamidreza, Hajizeinali Alimohammad, Alidoosti Mohammad, Aghajani Hassan, Nozari Younes, Amirzadegan Alireza, Bozorgi Ali, Genab Yaser
Department of Cardiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran Heart Center Hospital, Tehran, IR Iran.
Department of Cardiology, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Rajai Hospital, Karaj, IR Iran.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014 Jan;16(1):e9641. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.9641. Epub 2014 Jan 5.
Before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), it is not clear whether a routine early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in the emergency ward is beneficial or their administration in selected cases in the catheterization laboratory.
The present randomized clinical trial sought to investigate whether an earlier administration of Tirofiban could exert any impact on TIMI grade 3 flows and ST resolution in the electrocardiography of patients with STEMI before primary PCI.
Patients with STEMI within twelve hours of symptom commencement were included if primary PCI was planned to be performed within ninety minutes of admission and excluded if they had contraindications for Tirofiban. Seventy patients were randomized to receive 25 μg/kg of bolus Tirofiban early in the emergency ward (the early Tirofiban group) in three minutes and 70 did not receive Tirofiban (the control group). The primary endpoint of the study was a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flows on the initial angiogram. The study is registered as IRCT201105126463N1 in: www.irct.ir.
The study population had a mean age of 57.17 ± 10.09 years and included 79.3 % males. TIMI grade 3 flow was seen in 15 (21.4 %) patients of the Tirofiban group and 7 (10 %) of the control group (P = 0.06, odds ratio = 0.407, and 95 % confidence interval = 0.155-1.072). Complete ST resolution was seen in 30 (42.9 %) patients of the Tirofiban group and 34 (48.6 %) of the control group (P = 0.5).
Although TIMI grade 3 flows trended to be higher in the patients who received early Tirofiban in the emergency ward, the difference did not constitute statistical significance and possible benefits, therefore, require further clarification.
在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)之前,尚不清楚在急诊病房常规早期给予糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂是否有益,还是在导管室对特定病例给予此类药物有益。
本随机临床试验旨在研究早期给予替罗非班是否会对STEMI患者直接PCI前的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)3级血流以及心电图ST段回落产生影响。
症状发作12小时内的STEMI患者,若计划在入院90分钟内进行直接PCI则纳入研究,若有替罗非班使用禁忌证则排除。70例患者被随机分配在急诊病房早期三分钟内接受25μg/kg的替罗非班推注(早期替罗非班组),70例未接受替罗非班(对照组)。研究的主要终点是初始血管造影时的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)3级血流。该研究已在www.irct.ir上注册为IRCT201105126463N1。
研究人群的平均年龄为57.17±10.09岁,男性占79.3%。替罗非班组15例(21.4%)患者出现TIMI 3级血流,对照组7例(10%)(P = 0.06,比值比 = 0.407,95%置信区间 = 0.155 - 1.072)。替罗非班组30例(42.9%)患者ST段完全回落,对照组34例(48.6%)(P = 0.5)。
尽管在急诊病房接受早期替罗非班治疗的患者中TIMI 3级血流有升高趋势,但差异无统计学意义,因此,可能的益处需要进一步阐明。