Suppr超能文献

[荨麻疹的药物治疗——专家机构指南、注册文件与药物有效性证据之间的差异分析]

[Pharmacotherapy of urticaria--an analysis of the discrepancies between guidelines of expert bodies, registration documents and evidence for the effectiveness of drugs].

作者信息

Plichta Danuta, Spiewak Radosław

出版信息

Przegl Lek. 2013;70(12):1015-20.

Abstract

The year 2012 has seen relevant changes in Polish pharmaceutical legislation and drug reimbursement, among others limiting the reimbursement solely to indications stated in the Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs). A discrepancy with expert recommendations became apparent. The aim of this study was to analyze discordances between up-to-date expert recommendations, the SPCs in force, and the evidence for the effectiveness of recommended drugs in urticaria. Guidelines for the treatment of urticaria issued by Polish and international expert bodies were analyzed, along with the SPCs. A systematic review of clinical trials of recommended drugs was carried out. Of drugs recommended by the experts, 203 were authorized in Poland for urticaria treatment, including 167 oral preparations of second-generation antihistamines (SGAH, 8 active substances), 29 oral preparations of first-generation antihistamines (6 substances), 4 preparations of systemic glucocorticosteroids (2), 2 topical glucocorticosteroid preparations (2) and one combined preparation of human immunoglobulin with histamine. Among products both recommended by experts and licensed for the treatment of urticaria in Poland, high or moderate-level of evidence of effectiveness was available for 7 active substances (bilastine, cetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, loratadine, levocetirizine, rupatadine). Nevertheless, 39% of SGAH available in Poland (66 preparations of cetirizine, emedastine, levocetirizine, loratadine or fexofenadine) were registered exclusively for "chronic idiopathic urticaria" - a diagnosis inconsistent with the current state of medical knowledge. We conclude that there exist considerable discrepancies between expert recommendations for the pharmacotherapy of urticaria, the licensed use of drugs as defined in Summaries of Product Characteristics and scientific evidence for their effectiveness.

摘要

2012年,波兰药品立法和药品报销发生了相关变化,其中包括仅对产品特性摘要(SPC)中所述适应症给予报销。与专家建议之间的差异变得明显。本研究的目的是分析最新专家建议、现行SPC与推荐药物治疗荨麻疹有效性证据之间的不一致之处。分析了波兰和国际专家机构发布的荨麻疹治疗指南以及SPC。对推荐药物的临床试验进行了系统评价。专家推荐的药物中,有203种在波兰被批准用于治疗荨麻疹,其中包括167种第二代抗组胺药(SGAH,8种活性物质)的口服制剂、29种第一代抗组胺药(6种物质)的口服制剂、4种全身用糖皮质激素制剂(2种)、2种局部用糖皮质激素制剂(2种)以及1种人免疫球蛋白与组胺的联合制剂。在专家推荐且在波兰被许可用于治疗荨麻疹的产品中,有7种活性物质(比拉斯汀、西替利嗪、地氯雷他定、非索非那定、氯雷他定、左西替利嗪、卢帕他定)有高或中等水平的有效性证据。然而,波兰可用的SGAH中有39%(66种西替利嗪、依美斯汀、左西替利嗪、氯雷他定或非索非那定制剂)仅被注册用于“慢性特发性荨麻疹”——这一诊断与当前医学知识状况不符。我们得出结论,荨麻疹药物治疗的专家建议、产品特性摘要中定义的药物许可使用情况与其有效性的科学证据之间存在相当大的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验