• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年男性接受根治性前列腺切除术的病理和肿瘤学结果是否比年轻男性差?<70 岁和≥70 岁患者的配对分析。

Are pathological and oncological outcomes of elderly men treated with radical prostatectomy worse than those of younger men? Matched-pair analysis between patients aged <70 and ≥70 years.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group

Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun;44(6):587-92. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu038. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyu038
PMID:24721676
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare oncological outcomes of patients aged ≥70 years treated with radical prostatectomy with those of a clinically matched younger cohort.

METHODS

Data from 1268 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified according to age (<70 or ≥70 years) at the time of prostatectomy. After matching pre-operative factors (i.e. prostate specific antigen, positive biopsy cores, Gleason score, clinical stage and D'Amico risk group), 333 patients were chosen from each group.

RESULTS

The percentage of pathological stage ≥T3 in those of age <70 and ≥70 years was 30.3 and 33.0%, respectively (P = 0.51). The percentage of pathological Gleason score ≤6, 7 and ≥8 was not significantly different between the two age groups (P = 0.08). The percentage of organ-confined disease in those of age <70 and ≥70 years was 69.4 and 67.0%, respectively (P = 0.56). With a median follow-up of 50 months, 5-year prostate specific antigen recurrence-free survival in those of age <70 and ≥70 years was 83.4 and 80.1%, respectively (log rank, P = 0.199). Five-year cancer-specific survival in those of age <70 and ≥70 years was 100 and 99.4%, respectively (log rank, P = 0.317). Five-year overall survival in those of age <70 and ≥70 years was 98.4 and 96.4%, respectively (log rank, P = 0.228).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological and oncological outcomes in elderly patients (age ≥70 years) treated with radical prostatectomy were not significantly different from those of younger patients (age <70 years). This information will help refine the indications for definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer in elderly men.

摘要

目的

比较≥70 岁接受根治性前列腺切除术患者与临床匹配的年轻患者的肿瘤学结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2000 年至 2009 年间接受根治性前列腺切除术的 1268 例患者的数据。根据前列腺切除术时的年龄(<70 岁或≥70 岁)将患者分类。在匹配术前因素(即前列腺特异性抗原、阳性活检核心、Gleason 评分、临床分期和 D'Amico 风险组)后,从每个组中选择 333 例患者。

结果

年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁患者中病理分期≥T3 的比例分别为 30.3%和 33.0%(P=0.51)。两组患者病理 Gleason 评分≤6、7 和≥8 的比例无显著差异(P=0.08)。年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁患者中器官局限性疾病的比例分别为 69.4%和 67.0%(P=0.56)。中位随访 50 个月后,年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁患者的 5 年前列腺特异性抗原无复发生存率分别为 83.4%和 80.1%(对数秩检验,P=0.199)。年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁患者的 5 年癌症特异性生存率分别为 100%和 99.4%(对数秩检验,P=0.317)。年龄<70 岁和≥70 岁患者的 5 年总生存率分别为 98.4%和 96.4%(对数秩检验,P=0.228)。

结论

接受根治性前列腺切除术的老年(≥70 岁)患者的病理和肿瘤学结局与年轻患者(<70 岁)无显著差异。这些信息将有助于为老年男性局限性前列腺癌的确定性治疗提供更明确的适应证。

相似文献

1
Are pathological and oncological outcomes of elderly men treated with radical prostatectomy worse than those of younger men? Matched-pair analysis between patients aged <70 and ≥70 years.老年男性接受根治性前列腺切除术的病理和肿瘤学结果是否比年轻男性差?<70 岁和≥70 岁患者的配对分析。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun;44(6):587-92. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu038. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
2
Pathological and oncological outcomes of elderly men with clinically localized prostate cancer.老年局限性前列腺癌患者的病理与肿瘤学结局。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec;43(12):1238-42. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt143. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
3
Changes in indications and oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy after 2000--data from 1268 Japanese patients treated with radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2009.2000 年后根治性前列腺切除术适应证和肿瘤学结局的变化——2000 年至 2009 年间 1268 例行根治性前列腺切除术日本患者的数据。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;43(8):821-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyt072. Epub 2013 May 31.
4
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
5
Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.对采用根治性前列腺切除术治疗的达米科中度风险前列腺癌生化复发危险因素的重新评估。
Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.12898. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
6
Percentage of positive biopsy cores, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, pT and Gleason score as predictors of PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional outcome study in Japan.阳性活检核心的百分比、术前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、pT和Gleason评分作为根治性前列腺切除术后PSA复发的预测指标:日本一项多机构结局研究
BJU Int. 2006 Sep;98(3):549-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06379.x.
7
Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.低危前列腺癌患者符合前列腺癌国际主动监测标准行根治性前列腺切除术的病理和生化结局。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):914-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11658.x. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
8
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.韩国人群中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:一项与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的5年倾向评分匹配比较分析。
Int J Urol. 2014 Aug;21(8):781-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12447. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Long-term oncological outcome and risk stratification in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌患者的长期肿瘤学结果和风险分层。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun;42(6):541-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys043. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检标本中癌阳性核心的百分比强烈预测根治性前列腺切除术中的肿瘤分期和体积。
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):174-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Management of the Geriatric Urologic Oncology Patient.老年泌尿肿瘤患者的评估与管理
Curr Geriatr Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):7-15. doi: 10.1007/s13670-014-0106-5.
2
Controversies associated with the evaluation of elderly men with localized prostate cancer when considering radical prostatectomy.在考虑根治性前列腺切除术时,对老年局限性前列腺癌男性患者进行评估所涉及的争议。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;19(5):793-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0738-7. Epub 2014 Aug 26.