• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种超声方法测量腹主动脉直径的比较。

Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala; Department of Surgery, Mälarsjukhuset, Eskilstuna, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):633-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9463.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.9463
PMID:24723017
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta exist: the outer-to-outer (OTO) method, where callipers are placed on the outer layer of the aortic wall; the inner-to-inner (ITI) method, where callipers are placed on the inner layer of the aortic wall; and the leading edge-to-leading edge (LELE) method, where callipers are placed on the outer layer of the anterior wall and the inner layer of the posterior wall. The aim was to determine the variability of the three methods, differences between them, and the consequences on prevalence estimates.

METHODS

Some 127 consecutive patients with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were included. The maximal anteroposterior diameter was measured using the OTO, ITI and LELE methods by two vascular sonographers who were blinded to each other's measurements. The variability was described as the standard deviation.

RESULTS

The variability was 2.7 (95 per cent limits of agreements ± 5.4) mm for the OTO, 2.3 (± 4.6) mm for the ITI and 2.0 (± 4.0) mm for the LELE method. The corresponding coefficients of variability were 6.4, 6.1 and 5.0 per cent. The difference was 4.1 mm between ITI and OTO (P < 0.001), 2.0 mm between ITI and LELE (P < 0.001), and 2.1 mm between LELE and OTO (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LELE measurement was the most reproducible method of measuring the abdominal aorta. All methods showed a high degree of variability.

摘要

背景

有三种测量腹主动脉直径的超声方法:外-外(OTO)法,卡尺放置在主动脉壁的外层;内-内(ITI)法,卡尺放置在主动脉壁的内层;前缘-前缘(LELE)法,卡尺放置在前壁的外层和后壁的内层。目的是确定三种方法的可变性、它们之间的差异以及对患病率估计的影响。

方法

纳入了 127 例连续的小腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者。通过两位血管超声医师采用 OTO、ITI 和 LELE 方法对最大前后径进行测量,两位医师彼此之间的测量结果相互盲法。可变性用标准差表示。

结果

OTO 法的可变性为 2.7(95%可信区间为±5.4)mm,ITI 法为 2.3(±4.6)mm,LELE 法为 2.0(±4.0)mm。相应的变异性系数分别为 6.4%、6.1%和 5.0%。ITI 与 OTO 之间的差值为 4.1mm(P<0.001),ITI 与 LELE 之间的差值为 2.0mm(P<0.001),LELE 与 OTO 之间的差值为 2.1mm(P<0.001)。

结论

LELE 测量是测量腹主动脉最具可重复性的方法。所有方法均显示出高度的可变性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta.三种超声方法测量腹主动脉直径的比较。
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):633-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9463.
2
Superior Reproducibility of the Leading to Leading Edge and Inner to Inner Edge Methods in the Ultrasound Assessment of Maximum Abdominal Aortic Diameter.在超声评估最大腹主动脉直径中,前缘至前缘法和内缘至内缘法的重现性更好。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;55(2):206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.019. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
3
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: A Study on the Discrepancy between Inner to Inner and Outer to Outer Measurements.腹主动脉瘤直径:一项关于内外径测量差异的研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;49(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.002.
4
Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme.在全国性筛查项目中,对主动脉直径进行超声测量。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Aug;42(2):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
5
Editor's Choice - Comparison of the Reproducibility of Ultrasound Calliper Placement Methods in Abdominal Aortic Diameter Measurements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.编辑精选 - 腹部主动脉直径测量中超声测径器放置方法的再现性比较:诊断性测试准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Nov;66(5):620-631. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
6
Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods.超声测量用于腹主动脉瘤筛查:三种主流方法的直接比较。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Apr;47(4):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
7
CT angiography in stent-graft sizing: impact of using inner vs. outer wall measurements of aortic neck diameters.CT 血管造影在支架移植物尺寸选择中的应用:使用主动脉颈直径的内、外壁测量值的影响。
J Endovasc Ther. 2011 Jun;18(3):280-8. doi: 10.1583/10-3261.1.
8
Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.三维超声评估小无症状腹主动脉瘤。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):289-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
9
Intra- and interobserver variability in ultrasound measurements of abdominal aortic diameter. The Tromsø Study.腹主动脉直径超声测量的观察者内及观察者间变异性。特罗姆瑟研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998 Jun;15(6):497-504. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80109-3.
10
Clinical Agreement between Nurses in the Ultrasound Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Diameter within a National Screening Programme.一项全国性筛查项目中护士在超声测量腹主动脉直径方面的临床一致性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.11.020. Epub 2016 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal Aorta Screening During Routine Transthoracic Echocardiography in Zanzibar, Tanzania: The Zanzibar Heart Survey.坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔岛经胸超声心动图检查常规筛查腹主动脉:桑给巴尔岛心脏调查
Glob Heart. 2025 May 30;20(1):49. doi: 10.5334/gh.1432. eCollection 2025.
2
Advances in Imaging and Diagnosis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Shift in Clinical Practice.腹主动脉瘤成像与诊断的进展:临床实践的转变
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81321. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81321. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Increased diameter and stiffness of elastic but not muscular arteries in men with abdominal aortic aneurysm.
男性腹主动脉瘤患者弹性动脉而非肌性动脉的直径和僵硬度增加。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024 Jun 1;136(6):1410-1417. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00875.2023. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
A population-based study on hyperinsulinaemia and arterial stiffness in men with and without abdominal aortic aneurysm.一项针对有和没有腹主动脉瘤男性的高胰岛素血症与动脉僵硬度的基于人群的研究。
Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;12(4):e0290. doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000290. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Abdominal aortic aneurysm volume and relative intraluminal thrombus volume might be auxiliary predictors of rupture-an observational cross-sectional study.腹主动脉瘤体积和相对腔内血栓体积可能是破裂的辅助预测指标——一项观察性横断面研究。
Front Surg. 2023 May 5;10:1095224. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1095224. eCollection 2023.
6
The correlation between different ultrasound planes and computed tomography measures of abdominal aortic aneurysms.不同超声平面与腹主动脉瘤计算机断层扫描测量值之间的相关性。
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Oct 12;26(1):5-12. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12319. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Morphological factors associated with progression of subaneurysmal aortas.与(subaneurysmal)瘤体附近主动脉进展相关的形态学因素。
Br J Surg. 2023 Mar 30;110(4):489-497. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad030.
8
AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis.腹主动脉瘤再探讨:危险因素、管理及发病机制特征的综合综述
Biomedicines. 2022 Jan 2;10(1):94. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10010094.
9
A contemporary review of non-invasive methods in diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysms.腹主动脉瘤诊断中无创方法的当代综述。
J Ultrason. 2021 Nov 29;21(87):e332-e339. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2021.0055. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
A reduction in the vascular smooth muscle cell focal adhesion component syndecan-4 is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm formation.血管平滑肌细胞黏着斑成分 syndecan-4 的减少与腹主动脉瘤的形成有关。
Clin Transl Med. 2021 Dec;11(12):e605. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.605.