Suppr超能文献

交界性心动过速与右心室心尖部起搏时室房间期比较的诊断价值

Diagnostic value of comparison of ventriculoatrial interval during junctional tachycardia and right ventricular apical pacing.

作者信息

Crozier I, Wafa S, Ward D, Camm J

机构信息

Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. Georges Hospital Medical School, London.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1989 Jun;12(6):942-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1989.tb05032.x.

Abstract

We postulated that comparison of ventriculoatrial intervals during junctional tachycardia and during right ventricular apical pacing may provide similar diagnostic information to that obtained from the insertion of ventricular extrasystoles during tachycardia. We studied 39 patients with either atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) (23 patients) using a single atrioventricular accessory pathway or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) (16 patients). Ventriculoatrial [VA] intervals were measured during tachycardia, during right ventricular apical pacing at the same rate as that of the tachycardia and following a ventricular extrasystole delivered at the minimum reset interval (minimum prematurity of a ventricular extrasystole required to advance the subsequent atrial complex by more than 10 msec). The difference between the minimum VA interval during tachycardia and during ventricular pacing was closely related to both the minimum reset interval (r = 0.92, P less than 0.001) and the difference between the minimum VA interval during tachycardia and following a ventricular extrasystole delivered at the minimum reset interval (r = 0.97, P less than 0.001) in the 23 patients in whom the minimum reset interval could be determined. The ratio between the minimum ventriculoatrial interval during tachycardia and ventricular pacing could be determined in all cases and was between 1.53 and 1.68 in AVRT with right free wall (two patients), 0.94 and 1.29 with anteroseptal (three patients), 0.91 and 1.08 with posteroseptal (five patients) and 0.48 and 0.71 with left free wall (13 patients) pathways, while it was between 0.32 and 0.27 in AVNRT (16 patients). The ratio was more discriminative when corrected for ventricular latency and was also useful when calculated from the high right atrial electrogram. We concluded that comparison of ventriculoatrial intervals during junctional tachycardia and during right ventricular apical pacing can discriminate between the mechanisms of tachycardia and the site of pathway. It provides similar information to that obtained from ventricular extrasystoles during tachycardia with the advantage that it can be determined in all cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

我们推测,比较交界性心动过速期间和右心室心尖部起搏期间的室房间期,可能会提供与心动过速期间插入室性期前收缩所获得的类似诊断信息。我们研究了39例患者,其中23例为房室折返性心动过速(AVRT),通过单一房室旁路传导,16例为房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)。在心动过速期间、以与心动过速相同的速率进行右心室心尖部起搏期间以及以最小重整间期(使随后的心房波提前超过10毫秒所需的室性期前收缩的最小提前量)发放室性期前收缩后,测量室房[VA]间期。在23例能够确定最小重整间期的患者中,心动过速期间与心室起搏期间的最小VA间期差异与最小重整间期密切相关(r = 0.92,P<0.001),也与心动过速期间与以最小重整间期发放室性期前收缩后最小VA间期的差异密切相关(r = 0.97,P<0.001)。在所有病例中均可确定心动过速期间与心室起搏期间的最小室房间期之比,右游离壁AVRT(2例患者)为1.53至1.68,前间隔旁AVRT(3例患者)为0.94至1.29,后间隔旁AVRT(5例患者)为0.91至1.08,左游离壁AVRT(13例患者)为0.48至0.71,而AVNRT(16例患者)为0.32至0.27。经心室延迟校正后,该比值更具鉴别力,从高位右房电图计算时也很有用。我们得出结论,比较交界性心动过速期间和右心室心尖部起搏期间的室房间期,可以区分心动过速的机制和旁路部位。它提供了与心动过速期间室性期前收缩所获得的类似信息,优点是在所有病例中均可确定。(摘要截断于400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验