Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):96-104.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
To evaluate critically visual field (VF) improvement in participants in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).
Prospective, comparative case series from a randomized clinical trial comparing trabeculectomy and topical medications in treating open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
A total of 607 subjects with newly diagnosed OAG were identified for study. Baseline and follow-up VF tests were obtained and mean deviation (MD) change from baseline over follow-up was analyzed. Clinically substantial change (loss or improvement) was defined as change from baseline of ≥ 3 decibels in MD. Baseline factors were inspected to determine their association with VF improvement in repeated measures regression models.
The percentage of participants showing substantial VF improvement over time was similar to that showing VF loss through 5 years after initial treatment, after which VF loss became more frequent. Measures of better intraocular pressure (IOP) control during treatment were significantly predictive of VF improvement, including a lower mean IOP, a lower minimum IOP, and lower sustained levels of IOP over follow-up. Other predictive factors included female sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.73), visits 1 year prior to cataract extraction (OR = 0.11), and an interaction between treatment and baseline MD wherein surgically treated subjects with worse baseline VF loss were more likely to show VF improvement.
In the CIGTS, substantial VF loss and improvement were comparable through 5 years of follow-up, after which VF loss became more frequent. Predictive factors for VF improvement included several indicators of better IOP control, which supports the postulate that VF improvement was real.
批判性评估参与合作性初始青光眼治疗研究(CIGTS)的参与者的视野(VF)改善情况。
这是一项前瞻性、比较性病例系列研究,来自一项比较青光眼治疗的随机临床试验,包括小梁切除术和局部药物治疗开角型青光眼(OAG)。
共确定了 607 例新诊断为 OAG 的患者进行研究。获取基线和随访的 VF 测试,并分析从基线到随访的平均偏差(MD)变化。临床显著变化(损失或改善)定义为 MD 从基线变化≥3 分贝。检查基线因素,以确定它们与重复测量回归模型中的 VF 改善之间的关联。
随着时间的推移,表现出显著 VF 改善的参与者比例与初始治疗后 5 年内表现出 VF 损失的参与者比例相似,此后 VF 损失变得更加频繁。治疗期间更好的眼压(IOP)控制措施显著预测 VF 改善,包括更低的平均 IOP、更低的最低 IOP 和随访期间持续较低的 IOP 水平。其他预测因素包括女性(比值比[OR] = 1.73)、白内障摘除前 1 年就诊(OR = 0.11)以及治疗和基线 MD 之间的相互作用,其中基线 VF 损失更严重的手术治疗患者更有可能出现 VF 改善。
在 CIGTS 中,在 5 年的随访中,VF 损失和改善的幅度相当,此后 VF 损失变得更加频繁。VF 改善的预测因素包括多个更好的 IOP 控制指标,这支持了 VF 改善是真实的假设。