Suppr超能文献

通过多重聚合酶链反应鉴定疑似脓毒症患者中最常见的致病细菌。

Identification of the most common pathogenic bacteria in patients with suspected sepsis by multiplex PCR.

作者信息

Arabestani Mohammad Reza, Fazzeli Hossein, Nasr Esfahani Bahram

机构信息

Hamadan university of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014 Apr 15;8(4):461-8. doi: 10.3855/jidc.3856.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus spp., Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii have been found to be the most prevalent bacteremia-causing bacteria in patients with septicemia. Early detection of bloodstream infection (BSI) is crucial in the clinical setting. A multiplex PCR method for identification of these agents in clinical samples has been developed in parallel by conventional microbiological methods.

METHODOLOGY

The target genes selected for each of the organisms were very specific for designing primers. Design of primers was done using Mega4, Allel ID6, Oligo6, and Oligo analyzer software. The test comprises a universal PCR from the 16S rDNA gene and multiplex PCR from the rpoB, gyrA, sss, and chromosome X (as an internal control).

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity for universal PCR and multiplex PCR in comparison with BC were 83.87% and 91.58%, and 74.19% and 91.58%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for these two PCRs were 76.47% and 94.57%, and 74.19% and 91.58%, respectively. PCR failed to identify bacteria which were found conventionally in only 3.96% and 6.34% of the cases by universal and multiplex PCR (mostly bacteria not included in the PCR cassette). In 6.34% of the cases, multiplex PCR afforded identification of bacteria, but BC showed no bacteria in the sample.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiplex PCR approach facilitates the detection of bacteremia in blood samples within a few hours. Rapid detection of bacteria by multiplex PCR appears to be a valuable tool, allowing earlier pathogen-adopted antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients.

摘要

引言

已发现金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、肠球菌属、肠杆菌科、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌是败血症患者中最常见的引起菌血症的细菌。血流感染(BSI)的早期检测在临床环境中至关重要。已通过传统微生物学方法并行开发了一种用于在临床样本中鉴定这些病原体的多重PCR方法。

方法

为每种生物体选择的靶基因对于设计引物非常特异。使用Mega4、Allel ID6、Oligo6和Oligo分析仪软件进行引物设计。该测试包括来自16S rDNA基因的通用PCR和来自rpoB、gyrA、sss和X染色体(作为内部对照)的多重PCR。

结果

与血培养(BC)相比,通用PCR和多重PCR的灵敏度和特异性分别为83.87%和91.58%,以及74.19%和91.58%。这两种PCR的阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为76.47%和94.57%,以及74.19%和91.58%。通用PCR和多重PCR仅在3.96%和6.34%的病例中未能鉴定出通过传统方法发现的细菌(大多数细菌不包括在PCR试剂盒中)。在6.34%的病例中,多重PCR能够鉴定出细菌,但血培养显示样本中没有细菌。

结论

多重PCR方法有助于在数小时内检测血样中的菌血症。通过多重PCR快速检测细菌似乎是一种有价值的工具,可使重症患者更早地采用针对病原体的抗菌治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验