Efe Turgay, Felgentreff Markus, Heyse Thomas J, Stein Thomas, Timmesfeld Nina, Schmitt Jan, Roessler Philip P
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2014 Oct;59(5):431-7. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2013-0135.
Evidence for the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in supraspinatus tendinopathy without calcification is sparse, and therefore this treatment option is often controversial. Patients of a randomized placebo-controlled study to analyze the effects of ESWT on function and pain were revisited 10 years after the initial consultation. The former verum group received 6000 impulses (energy flux density, 0.11 mJ/mm²) in three sessions after local anesthesia between 1999 and 2000. The placebo group had 6000 impulses of a sham ESWT after local anesthesia in the same period. Re-evaluation of the patients included a relative Constant score as well as pain measurements (visual analogue scale) during activity and at rest. No significant changes (p>0.05) in relative Constant scores, pain at rest, or pain during activity could be found after a 10-year follow-up between the placebo and verum groups after ESWT. The treatment of non-calcific supraspinatus tendinopathy with ESWT does not seem to have an effect on function or pain improvement in the long run. The results of the present study cannot advise the use of ESWT in cases of non-calcific supraspinatus tendinopathy.
体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗非钙化性冈上肌腱病疗效的证据不足,因此这种治疗选择常存在争议。一项分析ESWT对功能和疼痛影响的随机安慰剂对照研究的患者在初次咨询10年后接受了回访。1999年至2000年期间,前治疗组在局部麻醉后分三次接受6000次脉冲(能量通量密度为0.11 mJ/mm²)。同期,安慰剂组在局部麻醉后接受6000次假ESWT脉冲。对患者的重新评估包括相对Constant评分以及活动期间和休息时的疼痛测量(视觉模拟量表)。ESWT治疗后10年随访,安慰剂组和治疗组之间在相对Constant评分、静息痛或活动痛方面均未发现显著变化(p>0.05)。从长远来看,ESWT治疗非钙化性冈上肌腱病似乎对功能或疼痛改善没有效果。本研究结果不建议在非钙化性冈上肌腱病病例中使用ESWT。