• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施领导力量表(ILS):开发一种用于衡量单位层面实施领导力的简短工具。

The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 14;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-45.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-9-45
PMID:24731295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4022333/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In healthcare and allied healthcare settings, leadership that supports effective implementation of evidenced-based practices (EBPs) is a critical concern. However, there are no empirically validated measures to assess implementation leadership. This paper describes the development, factor structure, and initial reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of a very brief measure of implementation leadership: the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS).

METHODS

Participants were 459 mental health clinicians working in 93 different outpatient mental health programs in Southern California, USA. Initial item development was supported as part of a two United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) studies focused on developing implementation leadership training and implementation measure development. Clinician work group/team-level data were randomly assigned to be utilized for an exploratory factor analysis (n = 229; k = 46 teams) or for a confirmatory factor analysis (n = 230; k = 47 teams). The confirmatory factor analysis controlled for the multilevel, nested data structure. Reliability and validity analyses were then conducted with the full sample.

RESULTS

The exploratory factor analysis resulted in a 12-item scale with four subscales representing proactive leadership, knowledgeable leadership, supportive leadership, and perseverant leadership. Confirmatory factor analysis supported an a priori higher order factor structure with subscales contributing to a single higher order implementation leadership factor. The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability as well as convergent and discriminant validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The ILS is a brief and efficient measure of unit level leadership for EBP implementation. The availability of the ILS will allow researchers to assess strategic leadership for implementation in order to advance understanding of leadership as a predictor of organizational context for implementation. The ILS also holds promise as a tool for leader and organizational development to improve EBP implementation.

摘要

背景

在医疗保健和相关医疗保健环境中,支持有效实施基于证据的实践(EBPs)的领导力是一个关键问题。然而,目前还没有经过实证验证的措施来评估实施领导力。本文介绍了一种非常简短的实施领导力评估工具的开发、结构、初始可靠性以及收敛和区分效度:实施领导力量表(ILS)。

方法

参与者是来自美国南加州 93 个不同门诊心理健康项目的 459 名心理健康临床医生。初始项目开发是作为两项美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)研究的一部分得到支持的,这两项研究旨在开发实施领导力培训和实施措施开发。临床医生工作组/团队级别的数据被随机分配用于探索性因素分析(n=229;k=46 个团队)或验证性因素分析(n=230;k=47 个团队)。验证性因素分析控制了多层次嵌套数据结构。然后对全样本进行可靠性和有效性分析。

结果

探索性因素分析得出了一个由 12 个项目组成的量表,有四个子量表,代表了积极主动的领导力、知识渊博的领导力、支持性的领导力和坚持不懈的领导力。验证性因素分析支持了一个预先设定的高阶因素结构,子量表为单一的高阶实施领导力因素做出贡献。该量表表现出了极好的内部一致性可靠性以及收敛和区分效度。

结论

ILS 是一种针对 EBP 实施的单位层面领导力的简洁而有效的衡量工具。ILS 的可用性将使研究人员能够评估实施的战略领导力,以提高对领导力作为实施组织背景预测因素的理解。ILS 也有望成为领导者和组织发展的工具,以改善 EBP 实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca5/4022333/3c398d9dd687/1748-5908-9-45-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca5/4022333/3c398d9dd687/1748-5908-9-45-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ca5/4022333/3c398d9dd687/1748-5908-9-45-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership.实施领导力量表(ILS):开发一种用于衡量单位层面实施领导力的简短工具。
Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 14;9(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-45.
2
Validity and reliability of the Greek version of Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS).《实施领导力量表(ILS)希腊语版的有效性和可靠性》。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 14;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00413-5.
3
Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) in Substance use Disorder Treatment Organizations.物质使用障碍治疗机构中实施领导力量表(ILS)的验证
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Sep;68:31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 14.
4
How is leadership behavior associated with organization-related variables? Translation and psychometric evaluation of the implementation leadership scale in German primary healthcare.领导行为如何与组织相关变量相关联?德国初级卫生保健中实施领导规模的翻译和心理测量评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 20;22(1):1065. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08434-z.
5
Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) with Supervisors' Self-Ratings.使用主管自评对实施领导力量表(ILS)进行验证
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Jan;54(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0114-y. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
6
Validity and reliability of the transculturally adapted Spanish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS).《实施领导力量表》(ILS)跨文化适应西班牙语版本的效度与信度
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 12;4(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00495-3.
7
Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: the development and validity testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS).评估循证实践实施的组织背景:实施氛围量表(ICS)的开发与效度测试。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 23;9:157. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0157-1.
8
EBP Implementation Leadership of Frontline Nurse Managers: Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale in Acute Care.一线护士长的 EBP 实施领导力:急性护理中实施领导力量表的验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Feb;17(1):82-91. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12402. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Cross-Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) in Child Welfare Service Organizations.儿童福利服务组织中实施领导力量表(ILS)的交叉验证
Child Maltreat. 2016 Aug;21(3):250-5. doi: 10.1177/1077559516638768. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
10
How do iLead? Validation of a scale measuring active and passive implementation leadership in Swedish healthcare.我如何领导?瑞典医疗保健中积极和被动实施领导力的衡量尺度的验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e021992. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021992.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing a multi-faceted strategy to support the implementation of ACEs screenings in primary care: results of a stepped-wedge pilot trial.测试一项多方面策略以支持在初级保健中实施不良童年经历(ACEs)筛查:一项阶梯式楔形试点试验的结果
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Sep 1;6(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00771-4.
2
Implementation strategies to integrate HIV and hypertension care in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Uganda: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (PULESA-Uganda).乌干达坎帕拉和瓦基索区整合艾滋病毒与高血压护理的实施策略:阶梯式楔形整群随机试验(PULESA-乌干达)的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13281-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation.实施的领导力与组织变革(LOCI):一项针对基于证据实践实施的领导力与组织发展干预措施的随机混合方法试点研究。
Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 16;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y.
2
Missing link in the service profit chain: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate.服务利润链中的缺失环节:服务氛围的前因、后果和调节因素的元分析综述。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):237-67. doi: 10.1037/a0031666.
3
Readiness and leadership for the implementation of polygenic risk scores: Genetic healthcare providers' perspectives in the hereditary cancer context.
多基因风险评分实施的准备情况与领导力:遗传医疗服务提供者在遗传性癌症背景下的观点
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70084. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70084.
4
Implementing LGBTQ-affirmative CBT: study protocol for an effectiveness-implementation trial at 90 LGBTQ community centers.实施对LGBTQ群体友好的认知行为疗法:一项在90个LGBTQ社区中心进行的有效性-实施试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13136-3.
5
Improving youth access to behavioral health services through integrated care and task shifting: protocol for a cluster-randomized stepped wedge clinical trial.通过综合护理和任务转移改善青少年获得行为健康服务的机会:一项整群随机阶梯式楔形临床试验方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jun 30;46:101518. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101518. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Site engagement in implementation research: Introducing SEAMLIS as a conceptual and measurement framework.实施研究中的场所参与:引入SEAMLIS作为一个概念和测量框架。
Health Justice. 2025 Jul 5;13(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00349-1.
7
Keeping Our ACT Team Together: Supervisory Strategies to Promote Workforce Retention.保持我们的ACT团队团结:促进员工留任的监督策略。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01458-7.
8
Leveraging the dynamic adaptation process to address LGBTQ+ health equity in New Mexico high schools.利用动态适应过程解决新墨西哥州高中的 LGBTQ+ 健康公平问题。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 3;5:1499508. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1499508. eCollection 2025.
9
Understanding school frontline workers' early implementation behavior: insights from the generation healthy kids study in Denmark.理解学校一线工作人员的早期实施行为:来自丹麦“健康儿童一代”研究的见解。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jun 2;7:1534123. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1534123. eCollection 2025.
10
The role of organizational characteristics in intervention sustainment: findings from a quantitative analysis in 42 HIV testing clinics in Vietnam.组织特征在干预维持中的作用:越南42家艾滋病毒检测诊所的定量分析结果
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 May 16;6(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00745-6.
Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation.
全州实施过程中的领导力、创新氛围和对循证实践的态度。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;51(4):423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.018.
4
Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.在管理决策中理解证据:基于研究的知识在医疗保健中的创新采用和实施的作用。研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-22.
5
The Soft Underbelly of System Change: The Role of Leadership and Organizational Climate in Turnover during Statewide Behavioral Health Reform.系统变革的软肋:全州行为健康改革期间领导力与组织氛围在人员流动中的作用
Psychol Serv. 2011;8(4):269-281. doi: 10.1037/a0026196.
6
A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.健康和心理健康领域临床创新实施策略汇编。
Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Apr;69(2):123-57. doi: 10.1177/1077558711430690. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
7
The NIHR Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Greater Manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy.英国国家健康研究所(NIHR)大曼彻斯特应用健康研究与护理合作组织(CLAHRC):结合经验、理论和实践证据来设计和评估大规模实施策略。
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 23;6:96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-96.
8
Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors.推进公共服务部门循证实践实施的概念模型。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
9
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.实施研究的结果:概念区别、测量挑战和研究议程。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
10
Efficiency in mental health practice and research.心理健康实践和研究的效率。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;32(5):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Aug 13.