Suppr超能文献

用于上肢重建的远位带蒂皮瓣的适应证、选择及应用

Indications, selection, and use of distant pedicled flap for upper limb reconstruction.

作者信息

Sabapathy S Raja, Bajantri Babu

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery and Burns, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore 641 043, India.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery and Burns, Ganga Hospital, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore 641 043, India.

出版信息

Hand Clin. 2014 May;30(2):185-99, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.01.002.

Abstract

Despite the inherent advantages of free flaps for soft tissue cover in upper limb reconstruction, pedicled flaps remain the workhorse in many centers worldwide. Presumed disadvantages of pedicled flaps are that it requires multiple stages, longer hospital stay, are bulky, and primary reconstruction of composite defects cannot be done. Refinements in technique during planning can offset many of the disadvantages. Pedicled flaps are quick and easy to raise and do not need any special microsurgical expertise. Where free flaps are not possible or they fail, pedicled flaps are the lifeboat. An upper limb reconstructive surgeon must be adept at performing these flaps in challenging situations.

摘要

尽管游离皮瓣在上肢重建的软组织覆盖方面具有内在优势,但带蒂皮瓣在全球许多中心仍然是主要手段。带蒂皮瓣的公认缺点是需要多期手术、住院时间更长、体积较大,并且无法对复合缺损进行一期重建。在手术规划过程中技术的改进可以抵消许多缺点。带蒂皮瓣掀起快速且容易,不需要任何特殊的显微外科专业技能。在无法进行游离皮瓣或游离皮瓣失败的情况下,带蒂皮瓣就是“救生艇”。上肢重建外科医生必须擅长在具有挑战性的情况下实施这些皮瓣手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验