Viscardi Juan A, Eseme Ebai A, Gohritz Andreas, Tremp Mathias, Merat Rastine, Kalbermatten Daniel F, Oranges Carlo M
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, Basel University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jan 10;11(1):e4745. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004745. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Large arm defects remain a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon, as local and regional flaps are limited regarding size and free flaps have disadvantages such as poor color match, technical complexity, prolonged operative time, and the risk of total flap loss. Keystone flaps are fascia-based flaps and combine perforator-based vascularity with relative simplicity of nonmicrosurgical techniques and do not distort local anatomy in cases of malignant excision with wide defects. This article highlights the approach of a multistaged procedure to reconstruct a large arm defect using a keystone type I flap and a temporary synthetic skin substitute for closure in a patient referred to our department for wide resection of a large melanoma in situ on the posterior aspect of the left arm. The defect, measuring 14 cm × 8 cm, was initially reconstructed with a keystone type I flap. Part of the wound was temporarily covered with EpiGARD (Biovision GmbH, Ilmenau, Germany) to avoid excessive wound tension. One week later, the wound was partially narrowed, and a smaller EpiGARD was placed in office under local anesthesia. The multistaged approach was completed with direct closure 1 week later after removal of the smaller EpiGARD. No complications occurred and the result was satisfactory with a pleasing cosmetic result after an 8-month follow-up. In conclusion, the keystone flap allows reconstruction of large arm defects. Temporary synthetic skin substitute coverage can serve as a good addition for those cases where tension on the margins is observed at the price of a small in-office procedure.
对于重建外科医生来说,上臂的大面积缺损仍然是一项挑战,因为局部和区域皮瓣在尺寸上有限,而游离皮瓣存在一些缺点,如颜色匹配不佳、技术复杂、手术时间延长以及皮瓣完全坏死的风险。关键皮瓣是基于筋膜的皮瓣,它将基于穿支血管的血供与相对简单的非显微外科技术相结合,并且在恶性肿瘤广泛切除导致大面积缺损的情况下不会扭曲局部解剖结构。本文重点介绍了一种多阶段手术方法,该方法使用I型关键皮瓣和临时合成皮肤替代品进行闭合,以重建一名因左臂后侧原位大黑色素瘤广泛切除而转诊至我院的患者的上臂大面积缺损。缺损面积为14 cm×8 cm,最初用I型关键皮瓣进行重建。伤口的一部分用EpiGARD(德国伊尔梅瑙Biovision GmbH公司)临时覆盖,以避免伤口张力过大。一周后,伤口部分变窄,并在局部麻醉下在门诊放置了一块较小的EpiGARD。在移除较小的EpiGARD 1周后,通过直接缝合完成了多阶段手术。未发生并发症,8个月随访后结果令人满意,美容效果良好。总之,关键皮瓣可用于重建上臂大面积缺损。对于那些观察到边缘存在张力的病例,临时合成皮肤替代品覆盖可以作为一种很好的补充,只需进行一个小的门诊手术即可。