Du Pont-Thibodeau Geneviève, Tucci Marisa, Ducruet Thierry, Lacroix Jacques
1Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. 2Department of Pediatrics, Research Center, Sainte-Justine Hospital, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;15(5):409-16. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000121.
To analyze the RBC transfusion practice patterns among pediatric intensivists in light of the new evidence advocating for a restrictive transfusion strategy.
Self-administered questionnaire.
PICUs.
Intensivists and fellows in pediatric critical care medicine.
None.
Scenario-based survey carried out among North American and European intensivists, working in tertiary-care PICUs. Respondents were asked to report their decisions with regard to RBC transfusion in stable critically ill children with bronchiolitis, septic shock, trauma, or tetralogy of Fallot repair scenarios. Answers were compared with those of a similar scenario-based survey administered to pediatric intensivists in 1997. Ninety-seven respondents were retained for the study, the majority from the United States, Canada, and France. In 2010, respondents reported that the mean (± SD) transfusion threshold was a hemoglobin level of 7.7 ± 1.0 g/dL for bronchiolitis, 8.1 ± 1.2 g/dL for trauma, 9.1 ± 1.2 g/dL for a tetralogy of Fallot repair, and 9.2 ± 1.0 g/dL for septic shock. For all clinical scenarios, there was a trend toward a more restrictive transfusion approach (a threshold ≤ 7 g/dL) in 2010 compared with 1997: a restrictive strategy was adopted by 55.7% of respondents in 2010 versus 37.0% in 1997 (p = 0.01) with the scenario of bronchiolitis, 8.3% versus 3.4% (p = 0.16) with septic shock, 38.1% versus 9.0% (p < 0.001) with trauma, and 16.0% versus 7.9% (p = 0.10) with tetralogy of Fallot repair.
Stated transfusion practice patterns of pediatric intensivists appear to be evolving toward a more restrictive approach two and a half years after the publication of the Transfusion Requirement in PICU trial. Incomplete implementation of new knowledge with regard to the safety of a restrictive transfusion approach in stable PICU patients is perplexing and requires further studies.
鉴于支持限制性输血策略的新证据,分析儿科重症监护医生的红细胞输血实践模式。
自行填写问卷。
儿科重症监护病房。
儿科重症医学的重症监护医生和研究员。
无。
对北美和欧洲在三级医疗儿科重症监护病房工作的重症监护医生进行基于病例的调查。要求受访者报告他们在患有支气管炎、感染性休克、创伤或法洛四联症修复手术的稳定重症患儿红细胞输血方面的决策。将答案与1997年对儿科重症监护医生进行的类似基于病例的调查结果进行比较。97名受访者被纳入研究,大多数来自美国、加拿大和法国。2010年,受访者报告,对于支气管炎,平均(±标准差)输血阈值为血红蛋白水平7.7±1.0 g/dL;对于创伤为8.1±1.2 g/dL;对于法洛四联症修复手术为9.1±1.2 g/dL;对于感染性休克为9.2±1.0 g/dL。与1997年相比,2010年所有临床病例中都有采用更严格输血方法(阈值≤7 g/dL)的趋势:在支气管炎病例中,2010年55.7%的受访者采用了限制性策略,1997年为37.0%(p = 0.01);感染性休克病例中分别为8.3%和3.4%(p = 0.16);创伤病例中分别为38.1%和9.0%(p < 0.001);法洛四联症修复手术病例中分别为16.0%和7.9%(p = 0.10)。
在儿科重症监护病房输血需求试验发表两年半后,儿科重症监护医生所述的输血实践模式似乎正朝着更严格的方法发展。在稳定的儿科重症监护病房患者中,关于限制性输血方法安全性的新知识实施不完全令人困惑,需要进一步研究。