Suppr超能文献

普通人群中成年人的矢状面站立姿势、背痛与生活质量:性别特异性关联

Sagittal standing posture, back pain, and quality of life among adults from the general population: a sex-specific association.

作者信息

Araújo Fábio, Lucas Raquel, Alegrete Nuno, Azevedo Ana, Barros Henrique

机构信息

*Institute of Public Health-University of Porto (ISPUP), Porto, Portugal †Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Predictive Medicine and Public Health, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal ‡Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; and §Department of Surgery, University of Porto Medical School, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):E782-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000347.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective radiographical study of sagittal standing posture among adults consecutively recruited from the general population.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the relation of suboptimal sagittal standing posture with back pain and health-related quality of life in general adult males and females.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Clinical studies have shown the association of sagittal standing posture with pain and reduced quality of life, but this relation has not been assessed in the general adult population.

METHODS

As part of the EPIPorto population-based study of adults, 178 males and 311 females were evaluated. Age, education, and body mass index were recorded. Radiographical data collection consisted of 36-in. standing sagittal radiographs. Creation of 3 groups for individual spinopelvic parameters was performed (low, intermediate, or high), and 1 of 4 sagittal types of postural patterns attributed to each participant (Roussouly classification). Back pain prevalence and severity were assessed on the basis of self-reported data and health-related quality of life using 2 main components of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

RESULTS

In males, differences in back pain severity were observed only among pelvic tilt/pelvic incidence ratio groups. Females presenting high pelvic incidence and sacral slope exhibited higher odds of severe back pain than those with intermediate values (adjusted odds ratios = 2.21 and 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-3.97 and 1.21-3.86; respectively). Sagittal vertical axis showed the largest differences in physical quality of life of females: high group had 8.8 lower score than the low group (P < 0.001), but this result lost statistical significance after adjustment for age, education, and body mass index.

CONCLUSION

Sagittal standing posture was not consistently associated with quality of life measures in males. Increased pelvic incidence and sacral slope may be involved in causing severe back pain among females. Monitoring sagittal postural parameters has limited usefulness as a screening tool for causes of unspecific musculoskeletal symptoms in the general adult population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

一项对从普通人群中连续招募的成年人矢状面站立姿势的前瞻性影像学研究。

目的

分析普通成年男性和女性中矢状面站立姿势欠佳与背痛及健康相关生活质量之间的关系。

背景数据总结

临床研究已表明矢状面站立姿势与疼痛及生活质量下降有关,但这种关系尚未在普通成年人群中进行评估。

方法

作为基于人群的EPIPorto成人研究的一部分,对178名男性和311名女性进行了评估。记录年龄、教育程度和体重指数。影像学数据收集包括36英寸站立矢状面X线片。针对个体脊柱骨盆参数创建3组(低、中或高),并为每位参与者确定4种矢状面姿势模式类型中的1种(鲁苏利分类法)。根据自我报告数据评估背痛患病率和严重程度,并使用36项简短健康调查问卷的2个主要组成部分评估健康相关生活质量。

结果

在男性中,仅在骨盆倾斜/骨盆入射角比值组之间观察到背痛严重程度的差异。骨盆入射角和骶骨斜率高的女性比中等值的女性出现严重背痛的几率更高(调整后的优势比分别为2.21和2.15;95%置信区间分别为1.24 - 3.97和1.21 - 3.86)。矢状垂直轴在女性身体生活质量方面显示出最大差异:高分组的得分比低分组低8.8分(P < 0.001),但在调整年龄、教育程度和体重指数后,该结果失去统计学意义。

结论

矢状面站立姿势与男性的生活质量指标并非始终相关。骨盆入射角和骶骨斜率增加可能与女性严重背痛的发生有关。监测矢状面姿势参数作为普通成年人群非特异性肌肉骨骼症状病因的筛查工具,其作用有限。

证据水平

3级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验