Albano Stephen, Gilmor Ruby, Calvelo Kevin, Afraz Rehman, Bacani Mary Grace, Siddiqi Javed
Neurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.
College of Osteopathic Medicine, Touro University of California, Vallejo, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Aug 16;12(8):e9785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9785.
Objective The objective of this pilot study was to determine if there is a correlation between the proposed physical testing protocol and low back pain. The proposed physical testing protocol is an attempt to assess muscular asymmetry in the anterior-posterior plane and the lateral plane. Methods A total of 96 volunteers were recruited from Touro University after obtaining IRB approval. Volunteers were initially provided a questionnaire regarding demographics and back pain. After ensuring participants satisfied the inclusion criteria, a physical test protocol was performed. After data compilation, odds ratios as well and linear regression models were generated to assess for correlation with back pain. Results A total of 96 participants were recruited. The odds ratio for asymmetric anterior-posterior balance in relation to back pain is 3.00 with a 95% confidence interval 1.26-7.12. The odds ratio for total ability to tolerate asymmetric loads greater than 50% of ideal body weight is 0.44 with a 95% confidence interval 0.11-1.77. The linear regression coefficient of anterior-posterior balance greater than 25% of ideal body weight in relation to level of pain is 1.96. Conclusions Increased muscular asymmetry in the sagittal plane and lateral plane showed a trend toward increased levels of low back pain; however, there is a weak correlation. This is a correlation and not an association. Future studies to assess the relationship between muscular balance and low back pain are needed to determine if therapy can be targeted to improve muscular sagittal balance, which can improve symmetry and back pain.
目的 本初步研究的目的是确定所提出的身体测试方案与腰痛之间是否存在相关性。所提出的身体测试方案旨在评估前后平面和侧平面的肌肉不对称性。方法 在获得机构审查委员会(IRB)批准后,从图罗大学招募了96名志愿者。志愿者最初收到一份关于人口统计学和背痛的问卷。在确保参与者符合纳入标准后,执行了身体测试方案。数据汇总后,生成优势比以及线性回归模型以评估与背痛的相关性。结果 共招募了96名参与者。与背痛相关的前后不对称平衡的优势比为3.00,95%置信区间为1.26 - 7.12。耐受大于理想体重50%的不对称负荷的总能力的优势比为0.44,95%置信区间为0.11 - 1.77。与疼痛程度相关的大于理想体重25%的前后平衡的线性回归系数为1.96。结论 矢状面和侧平面肌肉不对称性增加显示出腰痛水平增加的趋势;然而,相关性较弱。这是一种相关性而非关联性。需要进一步研究来评估肌肉平衡与腰痛之间的关系,以确定是否可以针对性地进行治疗以改善肌肉矢状面平衡,从而改善对称性和减轻背痛。