• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安大略省低急症急诊科使用者的社会经济构成。

Socioeconomic composition of low-acuity emergency department users in Ontario.

作者信息

Vanstone Nancy A, Belanger Paul, Moore Kieran, Caudle Jaelyn M

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart St, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 2014 Apr;60(4):355-62.

PMID:24733328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4046549/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the associations between the socioeconomic status of emergency department (ED) users and age, sex, and acuity of medical conditions to better understand users' common characteristics, and to better meet primary and ambulatory health care needs.

DESIGN

A retrospective, observational, population-based analysis. A rigorous proxy of socioeconomic status was applied using census-based methods to calculate a relative deprivation index.

SETTING

Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

All Ontario ED visits for the fiscal year April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2009, from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System data set.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Emergency department visits were ranked into deprivation quintiles, and associations between deprivation and age, sex, acuity at triage, and association with a primary care physician were investigated.

RESULTS

More than 25% of ED visits in Ontario were from the most deprived population; almost half of those (12.3%) were for conditions of low acuity. Age profiles indicated that a large contribution to low-acuity ED visits was made by young adults (aged 20 to 30 years) from the most deprived population. For the highest-volume ED in Ontario, 94 of the 499 ED visits per day were for low-acuity patients from the most deprived population. Most of the highest volume EDs in Ontario (more than 200 ED visits per day) follow this trend.

CONCLUSION

Overall input into EDs might be reduced by providing accessible and appropriate primary health care resources in catchment areas of EDs with high rates of low-acuity ED visits, particularly for young adults from the most deprived segment of the population.

摘要

目的

描述急诊科患者的社会经济状况与年龄、性别及病情严重程度之间的关联,以更好地了解患者的共同特征,并更好地满足初级和门诊医疗保健需求。

设计

一项基于人群的回顾性观察分析。采用基于人口普查的方法应用严格的社会经济状况代理指标来计算相对剥夺指数。

地点

安大略省。

参与者

来自国家门诊护理报告系统数据集的2008年4月1日至2009年3月31日财政年度安大略省所有急诊科就诊病例。

主要观察指标

将急诊科就诊病例按剥夺程度分为五等份,并研究剥夺程度与年龄、性别、分诊时的病情严重程度以及与初级保健医生的关联。

结果

安大略省超过25%的急诊科就诊病例来自最贫困人群;其中近一半(12.3%)是病情不太严重的情况。年龄分布表明,最贫困人群中的年轻人(20至30岁)对低严重程度急诊科就诊病例有很大贡献。对于安大略省就诊量最大的急诊科,每天499例急诊科就诊病例中有94例是来自最贫困人群的低严重程度患者。安大略省大多数就诊量最大的急诊科(每天超过200例急诊科就诊病例)都呈现这种趋势。

结论

通过在低严重程度急诊科就诊率高的急诊科集水区提供可及且适当的初级卫生保健资源,总体上可能会减少对急诊科的投入,特别是对于最贫困人群中的年轻人。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic composition of low-acuity emergency department users in Ontario.安大略省低急症急诊科使用者的社会经济构成。
Can Fam Physician. 2014 Apr;60(4):355-62.
2
Socioeconomic status of emergency department users in Ontario, 2003 to 2009.2003年至2009年安大略省急诊科患者的社会经济状况
CJEM. 2014 May;16(3):220-5. doi: 10.2310/8000.2013.131048.
3
Does the definition of preventable emergency department visit matter? An empirical analysis using 20 million visits in Ontario and Alberta.可预防的急诊科就诊定义重要吗?一项基于安大略省和艾伯塔省2000万次就诊的实证分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;29(11):1329-1337. doi: 10.1111/acem.14587. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
A population-based study of the association between socioeconomic status and emergency department utilization in Ontario, Canada.基于人群的研究:加拿大安大略省社会经济地位与急诊就诊利用度之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):836-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01127.x.
5
A descriptive study of heavy emergency department users at an academic emergency department reveals heavy ED users have better access to care than average users.一项针对某学术性急诊科中频繁就诊患者的描述性研究表明,频繁就诊的急诊科患者比普通患者更容易获得医疗服务。
J Emerg Nurs. 2005 Apr;31(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2005.02.008.
6
Decreasing Low Acuity Pediatric Emergency Room Visits with Increased Clinic Access and Improved Parent Education.通过增加诊所就诊机会和加强家长教育来减少低危儿科急诊就诊。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):550-557. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170474.
7
Predictors of Low-Acuity Emergency Department Use by Patients Enrolled in a Family Health Team.家庭医疗团队患者中低 acuity 急诊科就诊的预测因素。
CJEM. 2015 Jul;17(4):359-66. doi: 10.1017/cem.2014.46.
8
Rural-urban differences in emergency department wait times.城乡急诊等待时间差异。
Can J Rural Med. 2010 Fall;15(4):153-5.
9
The Ontario Asthma Regional Variation Study: emergency department visit rates and the relation to hospitalization rates.安大略省哮喘区域差异研究:急诊科就诊率及其与住院率的关系。
Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):909-17. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.909.
10
Epidemiology of maxillofacial injuries in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省颌面部损伤的流行病学
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Apr;73(4):693.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: a latent class analysis.有慢性疾病的频繁急诊患者特征:潜在类别分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 29;12(9):e055297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055297.
2
Associations between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Emergency Department Utilization in an Adult Medicaid Population.不良童年经历与成年医疗补助人群急诊就诊的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610149.
3
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the socioeconomic composition of emergency department presentations.COVID-19 大流行对急诊科就诊人群的社会经济构成的影响。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Dec;113(6):878-886. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00684-y. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
4
Geographic inequalities in paediatric emergency department visits in Ontario and Alberta: a multilevel analysis of 2.5 million visits.安大略省和艾伯塔省儿科急诊就诊的地理不平等:对 250 万次就诊的多层次分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jul 20;22(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03485-x.
5
Development of the use of primary health care emergency departments after interventions aimed at decreasing overcrowding: a longitudinal follow-up study.干预措施旨在减少过度拥挤后,基层医疗急救部门的使用发展:一项纵向随访研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 14;22(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00667-9.
6
Low-acuity emergency department use among patients in different primary care models in Hamilton and Ontario.在汉密尔顿和安大略省不同初级保健模式下的患者中,低 acuity 急诊部门的使用情况。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2021 Jul;34(4):234-239. doi: 10.1177/08404704211012027. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
A Mixed-Methods Investigation into Patients' Decisions to Attend an Emergency Department for Chronic Pain.一项混合方法研究,调查患者决定因慢性疼痛前往急诊科就诊的原因。
Pain Med. 2021 Oct 8;22(10):2191-2206. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab081.
8
Self-referred walk-in patients in the emergency department - who and why? Consultation determinants in a multicenter study of respiratory patients in Berlin, Germany.自行来急诊科就诊的患者——他们是谁,为什么要来?德国柏林一项关于呼吸科患者的多中心研究中的会诊决定因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):848. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05689-2.
9
Beyond Access Block: Understanding the Role of Health Literacy and Self-Efficacy in Low-Acuity Emergency Department Patients.超越就诊障碍:理解健康素养和自我效能在低急症急诊科患者中的作用
Ochsner J. 2020 Summer;20(2):161-169. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0047.
10
Examining the Association between Community-Level Marginalization and Emergency Room Wait Time in Ontario, Canada.考察加拿大安大略省社区边缘化程度与急诊室候诊时间之间的关系。
Healthc Policy. 2020 May;15(4):64-76. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26223.

本文引用的文献

1
International perspectives on emergency department crowding.国际视角下的急诊科拥挤现象。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1358-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01235.x.
2
Lesson from Canada's Universal Care: socially disadvantaged patients use more health services, still have poorer health.加拿大全民医保的教训:社会弱势群体患者使用更多医疗服务,但健康状况仍较差。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):274-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0669.
3
Access to primary care from the perspective of Aboriginal patients at an urban emergency department.从城市急诊部的原住民患者角度看基本医疗服务的可及性。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):333-48. doi: 10.1177/1049732310385824. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
4
Can after-hours family medicine clinics represent an alternative to emergency departments? Survey of ambulatory patients seeking after-hours care.家庭医生夜间诊所能否替代急诊科?对寻求夜间就诊的门诊患者的调查。
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Nov;55(11):1106-1107.e4.
5
A deprivation index for health planning in Canada.加拿大卫生规划的剥夺指数。
Chronic Dis Can. 2009;29(4):178-91.
6
Rural emergency department use by CTAS IV and V patients.CTAS 4级和5级患者对农村急诊科的使用情况。
CJEM. 2008 May;10(3):209-14. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010125.
7
The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes.急诊科拥挤对以临床为导向的结果的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00295.x. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
8
Nonurgent use of the emergency department.急诊科的非紧急使用。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Oct-Dec;31(4):370-6. doi: 10.1097/01.JAC.0000336555.54460.fe.
9
Barriers to addressing the social determinants of health: insights from the Canadian experience.解决健康问题社会决定因素的障碍:来自加拿大经验的见解。
Health Policy. 2008 Dec;88(2-3):222-35. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 May 8.
10
Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions.急诊科拥挤的系统评价:原因、影响及解决方案。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.014. Epub 2008 Apr 23.