Cooke J C, McBride J L, Schulak J A
Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Transplantation. 1989 Jul;48(1):15-9. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198907000-00004.
These experiments compared the effect of a five-day course (days - 1 to +3) of cyclosporine therapy coupled with pretransplant (day - 1) administration of donor-specific antigen (whole blood or splenocytes) on either pancreatic or heart allograft survival in the Buffalo to Lewis rat donor-recipient combination. CsA therapy alone significantly (P less than 0.001) prolonged both heart (16.2 +/- 1.6 days) and pancreas (12.5 +/- 1.5 days) graft survival when compared with nonimmunosuppressed control heart and pancreas grafts (7.7 +/- 1.8 and 7.9 +/- 1.0 days, respectively). Pretransplant transfusion with either 2 ml of BUF whole blood or 2 x 10(8) red cell-free splenocytes on day -1 also resulted in a significant (P less than 0.001) prolongation of heart survival (14.0 +/- 1.2 and 14.0 +/- 1.6 days, respectively) but did not improve pancreas allograft survival (9.4 +/- 1.5 and 8.5 +/- 1.0 days, respectively). Combination CsA and antigen therapy further improved heart graft survival to 26.5 +/- 6.1 days (whole blood) and 28.8 +/- 5.8 days (splenocytes) but did not improve pancreas graft survival over that of CsA therapy alone. Extension of CsA therapy by adding two additional 3-day cycles on days 10-12 and 17-19 further improved heart graft survival both after CsA alone (35.2 +/- 3.2 days) and after CsA coupled with whole-blood transfusion (45.3 +/- 8.6 days), but did not have a salutary effect on pancreas allograft survival. Portal vein administration of donor antigen was equally effective as systemic inoculation in prolonging heart graft survival when the splenocytes were given alone (11.6 +/- 1.7 days). Conversely, pancreas allograft survival was not beneficially effected by portal antigen administration whether or not CsA was given. These data demonstrate the ability of pretransplant donor-specific antigen administration and short-term CsA therapy to significantly prolong rat heart allograft survival across a strong MHC histocompatibility barrier-but, surprisingly, they also demonstrate the failure of this regimen to have a salutary effect on pancreas allograft survival.
这些实验比较了为期五天(-1天至+3天)的环孢素治疗联合移植前(-1天)给予供体特异性抗原(全血或脾细胞)对布法罗大鼠至刘易斯大鼠供受体组合中胰腺或心脏同种异体移植存活的影响。与未进行免疫抑制的对照心脏和胰腺移植(分别为7.7±1.8天和7.9±1.0天)相比,单独使用环孢素治疗显著(P<0.001)延长了心脏(16.2±1.6天)和胰腺(12.5±1.5天)移植的存活时间。在-1天预先输注2ml布法罗大鼠全血或2×10⁸无红细胞脾细胞也显著(P<0.001)延长了心脏存活时间(分别为14.0±1.2天和14.0±1.6天),但未改善胰腺同种异体移植的存活时间(分别为9.4±1.5天和8.5±1.0天)。环孢素与抗原联合治疗进一步将心脏移植存活时间提高到26.5±6.1天(全血)和28.8±5.8天(脾细胞),但与单独使用环孢素治疗相比,并未改善胰腺移植的存活时间。通过在第10 - 12天和17 - 19天额外增加两个3天周期来延长环孢素治疗,无论是单独使用环孢素(35.2±3.2天)还是环孢素联合全血输注后(45.3±8.6天),都进一步提高了心脏移植的存活时间,但对胰腺同种异体移植存活没有有益影响。当单独给予脾细胞时,门静脉注射供体抗原在延长心脏移植存活时间方面与全身接种同样有效(11.6±1.7天)。相反,无论是否给予环孢素,门静脉注射抗原对胰腺同种异体移植存活均无有益影响。这些数据表明,移植前给予供体特异性抗原和短期环孢素治疗能够显著延长大鼠心脏同种异体移植在强大的MHC组织相容性屏障下的存活时间——但令人惊讶的是,它们也表明该方案对胰腺同种异体移植存活没有有益影响。