University of Colorado and SomaLogic; Boulder, CO USA.
RNA Biol. 2014;11(3):236-8. doi: 10.4161/rna.28305. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
Many of the authors of these short pieces (who were invited to contribute by Robin Gutell) have already written or spoken about Carl Woese since he died at the end of December 2012. My own thoughts were published in PNAS on February 26, 2013. Still saddened by Carl's death, I re-read what I wrote at that moment. The article was OK, although it was not strong enough for what Carl taught us: he deserved better. I'd like us to admire what Carl did over 50 years (which is a given), and to admire even more the way he did it. While Carl's accomplishments were huge, his intense dedication to the ideas that consumed him was even more impressive.
这些短文的许多作者(他们是应罗宾·古特尔的邀请投稿的)自 2012 年 12 月底卡尔·沃斯去世后,已经写过或谈论过他。我自己的想法发表在 2013 年 2 月 26 日的《美国国家科学院院刊》上。卡尔的去世仍然让我感到悲伤,我重新阅读了我当时写的东西。这篇文章还可以,但对于卡尔教给我们的东西来说还不够有力:他应该得到更好的评价。我希望我们赞赏卡尔 50 多年来所做的一切(这是理所当然的),更赞赏他做事的方式。虽然卡尔的成就巨大,但他对让他着迷的想法的强烈投入更令人印象深刻。