Pilz M, Fischer-Tenhagen C, Grau M, Heuwieser W
W. Heuwieser, Tierklinik für Fortpflanzung, Fachbereich Veterinärmedizin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 65, 14163 Berlin, Email:
Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2014;42(2):88-94.
The objective of this study was to determine the origin of an arched back in cows during vaginal examination. Moreover, we tested whether the duration of an arched back and avoidance reactions during vaginal examination can be decreased by epidural anaesthesia or analgesic treatment.
Behaviour during cleaning of the perivaginal region and during vaginal examination was scored using the avoidance reactivity score (ARS). Heart rate (HR) was recorded in 10 dairy cows considering four experimental phases, i.e. baseline, cleaning the perivaginal region, vaginal examination and post-examination. Each cow was examined three times and received no treatment (CON), an epidural anaesthesia (EPID) or an analgesic treatment (NSAID). The duration of an arched back during and post-examination was measured.
The expression of the arched back was shortest in cows of group EPID and longest in cows of group CON. Avoidance reactions did not differ between the cleaning phase and vaginal examination in cows of group EPID. Cows of group CON showed the strongest avoidance reactions during examination, whereas cows of group EPID showed least avoidance reactions. Mean HR increased during cleaning and vaginal examination and decreased post-examination. Mean HR during vaginal examination did not differ between treatment groups.
The results show that cows express discomfort during vaginal examination with an increase in avoidance reactions and HR. Although epidural anaesthesia could reduce sensitivity in the perivaginal region, cows still felt the urge to empty the vagina from the examiner's hand and, thus, were arching their back.
In practice, routine vaginal examinations in dairy cows have not been considered as invasive examina- tions. Our results show that vaginal examinations indeed do cause discomfort. We do not suggest the application of any anaesthetic treatment as appropriate before routine vaginal examinations. Nonetheless, the examiner should be aware of the stress potential of vaginal examinations and conduct such examinations most carefully.
本研究的目的是确定奶牛在阴道检查时出现弓背的原因。此外,我们还测试了硬膜外麻醉或镇痛治疗是否可以缩短阴道检查时弓背的持续时间以及避免反应。
使用回避反应评分(ARS)对阴道周围区域清洁和阴道检查期间的行为进行评分。记录10头奶牛在四个实验阶段的心率(HR),即基线、阴道周围区域清洁、阴道检查和检查后。每头奶牛检查三次,分别不接受治疗(CON)、硬膜外麻醉(EPID)或镇痛治疗(NSAID)。测量检查期间和检查后弓背的持续时间。
EPID组奶牛弓背的表现最短,CON组奶牛最长。EPID组奶牛在清洁阶段和阴道检查之间的回避反应没有差异。CON组奶牛在检查期间表现出最强的回避反应,而EPID组奶牛表现出最少的回避反应。清洁和阴道检查期间平均心率增加,检查后降低。治疗组之间阴道检查期间的平均心率没有差异。
结果表明,奶牛在阴道检查期间表现出不适,回避反应和心率增加。尽管硬膜外麻醉可以降低阴道周围区域的敏感性,但奶牛仍感到有将阴道内东西从检查者手中排出的冲动,因此会弓背。
在实践中,奶牛的常规阴道检查未被视为侵入性检查。我们的结果表明,阴道检查确实会引起不适。我们不建议在常规阴道检查前适当应用任何麻醉治疗。尽管如此,检查者应意识到阴道检查的潜在压力,并尽可能小心地进行此类检查。