• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品和药物管理局对临床研究者的检查:1977 年至 2009 年结果概述。

U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspections of clinical investigators: overview of results from 1977 to 2009.

机构信息

Authors' Affiliations: Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;

Division of Medical Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 1;20(13):3364-70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3206. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3206
PMID:24737548
Abstract

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research is responsible for evaluating drug safety and efficacy, including oversight of clinical trials and principal investigators. The FDA Clinical Investigator Inspection List (CIIL) contains online, detailed, relevant information of all FDA inspections. We reviewed FDA inspections of clinical investigators to ascertain their outcome and included all inspections on the list (July 1977 through December 31, 2009; n = 9,481 inspections). Eighty-eight percent of inspections were "data audit" (primary purpose = verification of data), and the rest (12%) were "for cause." The number of inspections each year significantly increased over time (P < 0.0001) and averaged 350 per year in the past decade. No deficiencies were found in only 11.2% of all "data audit" and 5% of all "for cause" inspections. Only 31% of inspections resulted in "no action indicated." About two thirds of inspections resulted in some finding, requiring either voluntary investigator action (61.3% of inspections) or official FDA action (3.9%). The most frequently cited deficiencies were failure to follow investigational plan (34%), inadequate informed consent form (28%), and inadequate/inaccurate records (27%). In conclusion, over the past decade, the FDA has performed approximately 350 inspections per year, with the number increasing over time. The vast majority of FDA inspections yield deficiency findings and, as a result, only about one third of inspections have an outcome of "no action indicated."

摘要

美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)药品评估和研究中心负责评估药物的安全性和有效性,包括对临床试验和主要研究者的监督。FDA 临床研究者检查清单(CIIL)包含所有 FDA 检查的在线、详细、相关信息。我们审查了 FDA 对临床研究者的检查,以确定其结果,并包括清单上的所有检查(1977 年 7 月至 2009 年 12 月 31 日;n = 9481 次检查)。88%的检查是“数据审核”(主要目的是验证数据),其余 12%是“有因检查”。每年的检查数量随着时间的推移显著增加(P < 0.0001),在过去十年中平均每年有 350 次检查。只有 11.2%的“数据审核”和 5%的“有因检查”没有发现缺陷。只有 31%的检查结果为“无需采取行动”。大约三分之二的检查结果发现了一些问题,需要调查员自愿采取行动(61.3%的检查)或 FDA 采取官方行动(3.9%)。最常被引用的缺陷是未遵循研究计划(34%)、知情同意书不充分(28%)和记录不充分/不准确(27%)。总之,在过去十年中,FDA 每年大约进行 350 次检查,且数量随着时间的推移而增加。绝大多数 FDA 检查都发现了缺陷,因此只有大约三分之一的检查结果为“无需采取行动”。

相似文献

1
U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspections of clinical investigators: overview of results from 1977 to 2009.美国食品和药物管理局对临床研究者的检查:1977 年至 2009 年结果概述。
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Jul 1;20(13):3364-70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3206. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
2
Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency.美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局良好临床实践检查结果的描述性分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):753-764. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00417-w. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Why (not) go east? Comparison of findings from FDA Investigational New Drug study site inspections performed in Central and Eastern Europe with results from the USA, Western Europe, and other parts of the world.为什么(不)往东走?美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)对中东欧地区开展的研究性新药研究场所检查结果与美国、西欧及世界其他地区的检查结果对比
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012;6:53-60. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S30109. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
Central site monitoring: results from a test of accuracy in identifying trials and sites failing Food and Drug Administration inspection.中心监测站点:在识别食品和药物管理局检查失败的试验和站点方面的准确性测试结果。
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):205-17. doi: 10.1177/1740774513508028. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
5
FDA audits of clinical studies: policy and procedure.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1990 Apr;30(4):296-302. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1990.tb03597.x.
6
Research Deviations in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of FDA Inspection Citations.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)监管的临床试验中的研究偏差:对FDA检查引用情况的横断面分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):579-591. doi: 10.1177/2168479017751405. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
7
A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Research Misconduct Using FDA-Issued Warning Letters and Clinical Investigator Inspection List From 2010 to 2014.2010 年至 2014 年期间,使用 FDA 发布的警告信和临床研究者检查清单对临床研究不当行为进行回顾性分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):976-982. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002694.
8
Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature.美国食品和药物管理局发现的研究不端行为:视而不见,置若罔闻,从同行评审文献中消失。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):567-77. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7774.
9
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员的警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):129-34.
10
An FDA Analysis of Inspected Entities After Receiving Official Action Indicated Letters for Good Clinical Practice Violations.收到临床实验违规官方行动指示函后,FDA 对受检实体的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):907-917. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00267-y. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.新型抗癌药物:在解决高价问题的同时,可靠地评估“价值”。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 28;31(5):2453-2480. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.
2
Practical Guidelines for Standardised Resolution of Important Protocol Deviations in Clinical Trials Conducted in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区开展的临床试验中重要方案偏离的标准化解决实用指南。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 May;58(3):395-403. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00604-3. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
3
Blockchain Applications in Health Care and Public Health: Increased Transparency.
区块链在医疗保健和公共卫生领域的应用:提高透明度。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jun 8;9(6):e20713. doi: 10.2196/20713.
4
A Blockchain-Based Consent Platform for Active Assisted Living: Modeling Study and Conceptual Framework.基于区块链的主动式养老同意平台:建模研究与概念框架
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 4;22(12):e20832. doi: 10.2196/20832.
5
Clinical Investigator Training Program (CITP) - A practical and pragmatic approach to conveying clinical investigator competencies and training to busy clinicians.临床研究者培训项目(CITP)——一种向忙碌的临床医生传授临床研究者能力和培训的实用且务实的方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jun 12;19:100589. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100589. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
'Screening audit' as a quality assurance tool in good clinical practice compliant research environments.“筛查审核”作为良好临床实践合规研究环境中的一种质量保证工具。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Apr 25;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0269-2.