• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国一项基于粪便免疫化学检测的有组织的结直肠癌筛查项目的成本与效益

Costs and benefits of an organized fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States.

作者信息

Guy Gery P, Richardson Lisa C, Pignone Michael P, Plescia Marcus

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Cancer. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2308-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28724. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.28724
PMID:24737634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4593052/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite clear recommendations and evidence linking colorectal cancer screening to lower incidence and mortality, > 40% of adults are not up to date with screening. Existing domestic and international models of organized cancer screening programs have been effective in increasing screening rates. Implementing an organized, evidence-based, national screening program may be an effective approach to increasing screening rates.

METHODS

In the current study, the authors estimated the initial investment required and the cost per person screened of a nationwide fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-based colorectal cancer screening program among adults aged 50 years to 75 years.

RESULTS

The initial additional investment required was estimated at $277.9 to $318.2 million annually, with an estimated 8.7 to 9.4 million individuals screened at a cost of $32 to $39 per person screened. The program was estimated to prevent 2900 to 3100 deaths annually.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study indicate that implementing a national screening program would make a substantial public health impact at a moderate cost per person screened. Results from this analysis may provide useful information for understanding the public health benefit of an organized screening delivery system and the potential resources required to implement a nationwide colorectal cancer screening program, and help guide decisions about program planning, design, and implementation.

摘要

背景

尽管有明确的建议和证据表明结直肠癌筛查与降低发病率和死亡率相关,但仍有超过40%的成年人未及时进行筛查。现有的国内外有组织癌症筛查项目模式在提高筛查率方面已取得成效。实施一项有组织、基于证据的全国性筛查项目可能是提高筛查率的有效途径。

方法

在本研究中,作者估算了一项针对50至75岁成年人的基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的全国性结直肠癌筛查项目所需的初始投资以及每人的筛查成本。

结果

估计每年所需的初始额外投资为2.779亿至3.182亿美元,预计将筛查870万至940万人,每人筛查成本为32至39美元。该项目预计每年可预防2900至3100例死亡。

结论

本研究结果表明,实施全国性筛查项目将以每人适度的筛查成本产生重大的公共卫生影响。该分析结果可为理解有组织筛查服务系统的公共卫生效益以及实施全国性结直肠癌筛查项目所需的潜在资源提供有用信息,并有助于指导项目规划、设计和实施方面的决策。

相似文献

1
Costs and benefits of an organized fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program in the United States.美国一项基于粪便免疫化学检测的有组织的结直肠癌筛查项目的成本与效益
Cancer. 2014 Aug 1;120(15):2308-15. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28724. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
2
Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test.基于乙状结肠镜检查和免疫化学粪便隐血试验的结直肠癌筛查计划的成本效益。
J Med Screen. 2019 Jun;26(2):76-83. doi: 10.1177/0969141318789710. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
The Costs and Benefits of Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening Based On Phenotypic and Genetic Risk: A Health Economic Analysis.基于表型和遗传风险的结直肠癌筛查风险分层的成本效益分析:一项健康经济学分析。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Aug;14(8):811-822. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0620. Epub 2021 May 26.
4
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Clinics.社区诊所中非侵入性结直肠癌筛查的成本效益
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454938. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54938.
6
Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.提高澳大利亚国家结直肠癌筛查计划的参与度和投资效益,改善其结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 3;15(2):e0227899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227899. eCollection 2020.
7
Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State.华盛顿州联邦合格健康中心实施的多层结直肠癌筛查推广干预措施的效果和成本。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4121-4129. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31693. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.澳大利亚癌症筛查的益处、危害及成本效益:建模估计概述
Public Health Res Pract. 2019 Jul 31;29(2):29121913. doi: 10.17061/phrp2921913.
9
Longitudinal Adherence to Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing vs Guaiac-based FOBT in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.在一项有组织的结直肠癌筛查计划中,免疫化学粪便潜血试验与愈创木脂粪便潜血试验的纵向依从性比较。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 May;12(5):327-334. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0091. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Comparison of Program Resources Required for Colonoscopy and Fecal Screening: Findings From 5 Years of the Colorectal Cancer Control Program.结肠镜检查和粪便筛查所需程序资源的比较:来自大肠癌控制计划 5 年的研究结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Apr 25;16:E50. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180338.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability and implementation potential of a health literacy intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas: A qualitative study of patients and general practitioners participating in a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项提高贫困地区结直肠癌筛查率的健康素养干预措施的可接受性及实施潜力:一项针对参与整群随机对照试验的患者和全科医生的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329639. eCollection 2025.
2
Type 2 Diabetes in Taiwan: Unmasking Influential Factors Through Advanced Predictive Modeling.台湾的2型糖尿病:通过先进的预测模型揭示影响因素。
J Diabetes Res. 2025 May 27;2025:5531934. doi: 10.1155/jdr/5531934. eCollection 2025.
3
Costs and Projected Effect of a Federally Qualified Health Center-Based Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Texas.得克萨斯州基于合格联邦健康中心的邮寄结直肠癌筛查计划的成本和预期效果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 May 2;21:E30. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230266.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Community-to-Clinic Tailored Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Group-Randomized Trial.社区到诊所的定制导航在服务不足人群中的结直肠癌筛查的成本效益:一项随机分组试验的经济评估。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):678-686. doi: 10.1177/08901171211068454. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
5
Process Evaluation of a Mailed Interactive Educational DVD in a Comparative Effectiveness Trial to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening.邮寄互动式教育 DVD 在促进结直肠癌筛查的比较效果试验中的过程评估。
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Sep;23(5):874-883. doi: 10.1177/15248399211027831. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
6
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测在一个医疗保障人群中的效果和成本效益。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3441-3447. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06691-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review.大规模邮寄粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查外展项目的患者选择:系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):379-388. doi: 10.1177/0969141321997482. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Startup and implementation costs of a colorectal cancer screening tailored navigation research study.结直肠癌筛查定制导航研究的启动和实施成本。
Eval Program Plann. 2021 Apr;85:101907. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101907. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
Comparative cost-effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the Medicaid population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)为基础的干预措施在医疗补助人群中提高结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4197-4208. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32992. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.在服务不足人群中提高结直肠癌筛查率的粪便免疫化学试验外展、结肠镜外展与常规护理的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1725-32. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9294.
2
Eliminating racial disparities in colorectal cancer in the real world: it took a village.在现实世界中消除结直肠癌的种族差异:需要众人的力量。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun 1;31(16):1928-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.8412. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
3
Shift to earlier stage at diagnosis as a consequence of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program.由于国家肠癌筛查计划,诊断时更早地转移到早期阶段。
Med J Aust. 2013 Apr 1;198(6):327-30. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11357.
4
Program to improve colorectal cancer screening in a low-income, racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial.提高低收入、种族多样化人群结直肠癌筛查率的项目:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):412-7. doi: 10.1370/afm.1381.
5
Factors associated with never being screened for colorectal cancer.与从未接受过结直肠癌筛查相关的因素。
J Community Health. 2013 Feb;38(1):31-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9600-x.
6
Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.筛查和息肉切除术后结肠镜监测指南:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的共识更新
Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):844-857. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.干预措施提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的效果:《社区预防服务指南》的 9 项更新系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):97-118. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009.
8
Cancer screening - United States, 2010.癌症筛查 - 美国,2010 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Jan 27;61(3):41-5.
9
The health burden and economic costs of cutaneous melanoma mortality by race/ethnicity-United States, 2000 to 2006.按种族/族裔划分的黑色素瘤死亡率所致的健康负担和经济成本-美国,2000 年至 2006 年。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Nov;65(5 Suppl 1):S133-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.04.036.
10
Optimizing colorectal cancer screening by getting FIT right.通过正确进行粪便免疫化学检测优化结直肠癌筛查。
Gastroenterology. 2011 Nov;141(5):1551-5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.09.021. Epub 2011 Sep 22.