Suppr超能文献

国家胆囊切除术数据登记系统(GallRiks)中胆囊切除术数据的完整性和准确性。

Completeness and correctness of cholecystectomy data in a national register--GallRiks.

作者信息

Rystedt J, Montgomery A, Persson G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden

Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund and Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Surg. 2014 Dec;103(4):237-44. doi: 10.1177/1457496914523412. Epub 2014 Apr 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To validate the Swedish Register for Gallstone Surgery and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (GallRiks) concerning completeness and correctness of entered data for cholecystectomies and evaluating the effect of repeated audits. It is crucial for any register to obtain a high accuracy in order to be a credible and reliable source for quality evaluation, research, and development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Completeness was determined by cross-matching the register with the Swedish National Patient Register. Completeness and overall correctness were assessed by comparing registered data to medical records. Correctness for rare occasions, such as bile duct injuries, was evaluated by comparing with claims sent to the Swedish Patient Insurance.

RESULTS

Of 64,538 cholecystectomies, 82.9% of the operations were registered in GallRiks and the coverage increased over time. By random sample, 94,919 sets of data were available for comparison at the first and second audit and the entries were found to be correct in 97.2% and 98.2% cases, respectively. A 100% correctness for bile duct injuries (n = 40) was seen when the index-operation was registered in GallRiks.

CONCLUSION

GallRiks demonstrates high completeness, high correctness of entered data, and no indications of failure to report serious adverse events. Repeated audits increased the quality of registered data. GallRiks may be used for clinical evaluation on local and national level and the database enables scientific studies to be performed.

摘要

背景与目的

验证瑞典胆结石手术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影登记系统(GallRiks)中胆囊切除术录入数据的完整性和正确性,并评估重复审核的效果。对于任何登记系统而言,要成为质量评估、研究和发展的可靠来源,获得高准确性至关重要。

材料与方法

通过将该登记系统与瑞典国家患者登记系统交叉匹配来确定完整性。通过将登记数据与病历进行比较来评估完整性和总体正确性。对于罕见情况,如胆管损伤,通过与发送给瑞典患者保险的索赔进行比较来评估正确性。

结果

在64538例胆囊切除术中,82.9%的手术记录在GallRiks中,且覆盖范围随时间增加。通过随机抽样,在首次和第二次审核时有94919组数据可供比较,发现条目的正确率分别为97.2%和98.2%。当索引手术记录在GallRiks中时,胆管损伤(n = 40)的记录正确率为100%。

结论

GallRiks显示出高完整性、录入数据的高正确性,且无未报告严重不良事件的迹象。重复审核提高了登记数据的质量。GallRiks可用于地方和国家层面的临床评估,该数据库能够开展科学研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验