University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2014 May;69(5):445-51. doi: 10.1111/anae.12632.
Pulse oximetry is widely accepted as essential monitoring for safe anaesthesia, yet is frequently unavailable in resource-limited settings. The Lifebox pulse oximeter, and associated management training programme, was delivered to 79 non-physician anaesthetists attending the 2011 Uganda Society of Anaesthesia Annual Conference. Using a standardised assessment, recipients were tested for their knowledge of oximetry use and hypoxia management before, immediately following and 3-5 months after the training. Before the course, the median (IQR [range]) test score for the anaesthetists was 36 (34-39 [26-44]) out of a maximum of 50 points. Immediately following the course, the test score increased to 41 (38-43 [25-47]); p < 0.0001 and at the follow-up visit at 3-5 months it was 41 (39-44 [33-49]); p = 0.001 compared with immediate post-training test scores, and 75/79 (95%) oximeters were in routine clinical use. This method of introduction resulted in a high rate of uptake of oximeters into clinical practice and a demonstrable retention of knowledge in a resource-limited setting.
脉搏血氧饱和度监测已被广泛认可为安全麻醉的基本监测手段,但在资源有限的环境中常常无法获得。Lifebox 脉搏血氧计及其相关管理培训计划已提供给参加 2011 年乌干达麻醉学会年会的 79 名非医师麻醉师。使用标准化评估,在培训前、培训后即刻以及 3-5 个月后对接受者进行血氧计使用和缺氧管理知识测试。在课程开始前,麻醉师的测试平均分数(IQR [范围])为 50 分中的 36 分(34-39 [26-44])。课程结束后,测试分数增加到 41 分(38-43 [25-47]);p<0.0001,在 3-5 个月的随访访问中,测试分数为 41 分(39-44 [33-49]);p=0.001,与培训后即刻的测试分数相比,并且 79/79(95%)台血氧计正在常规临床使用。这种引入方法导致血氧计在临床实践中的高采用率,并在资源有限的环境中证明了知识的保留。