Suppr超能文献

蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外联合阻滞与硬膜外阻滞用于分娩镇痛对胎儿的影响:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

Fetal effects of combined spinal-epidural vs epidural labour analgesia: a prospective, randomised double-blind study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2014 May;69(5):458-67. doi: 10.1111/anae.12602.

Abstract

We have compared fetal heart rate patterns, Apgar scores and umbilical cord gas values following initiation of labour analgesia using either combined spinal-epidural or epidural. One hundred and fifteen healthy women requesting neuraxial analgesia in the first stage of labour were randomly assigned to receive either combined spinal-epidural (n = 62) or epidural analgesia (n = 53). Fetal heart rate traces, recorded for 30 min before and 60 min after neuraxial block, were categorised as normal, suspicious or pathological according to national guidelines. Sixty-one fetal heart rate tracings were analysed in the combined spinal-epidural group and 52 in the epidural group. No significant differences were found in fetal heart rate patterns, Apgar scores or umbilical artery and vein acid-base status between groups. However, in both combined spinal-epidural and epidural groups, there was a significant increase in the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns following neuraxial analgesia (p < 0.0001); two before compared with eight after analgesia in the combined spinal-epidural group and zero before compared with 11 after in the epidural group. These changes comprised increased decelerations (p = 0.0045) (combined spinal-epidural group nine before and 14 after analgesia, epidural group four before and 16 after), increased late decelerations (p < 0.0001) (combined spinal-epidural group zero before and seven after analgesia, epidural group zero before and eight after), and a reduction in acceleration rate (p = 0.034) (combined spinal-epidural group mean (SD) 12.2 (6.7) h(-1) before and 9.9 (6.1) h(-1) after analgesia, epidural group 11.0 (7.3) h(-1) before and 8.4 (5.9) h(-1) after). These fetal heart rate changes did not affect neonatal outcome in this healthy population.

摘要

我们比较了使用脊麻-硬膜外联合麻醉或硬膜外麻醉启动分娩镇痛后胎儿心率模式、阿普加评分和脐动脉血气值。115 名要求在分娩第一阶段接受椎管内镇痛的健康妇女被随机分配接受脊麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(n = 62)或硬膜外镇痛(n = 53)。根据国家指南,在脊麻-硬膜外阻滞前 30 分钟和阻滞后 60 分钟记录胎儿心率轨迹,并将其分类为正常、可疑或病理性。在脊麻-硬膜外联合组中分析了 61 个胎儿心率轨迹,在硬膜外组中分析了 52 个胎儿心率轨迹。两组间胎儿心率模式、阿普加评分或脐动静脉酸碱状态无显著差异。然而,在脊麻-硬膜外联合组和硬膜外组中,神经阻滞后异常胎儿心率模式的发生率均显著增加(p < 0.0001);联合脊麻-硬膜外组镇痛前有 2 例,镇痛后有 8 例;硬膜外组镇痛前无,镇痛后有 11 例。这些变化包括减速增加(p = 0.0045)(联合脊麻-硬膜外组镇痛前 9 例,镇痛后 14 例;硬膜外组镇痛前 4 例,镇痛后 16 例),晚期减速增加(p < 0.0001)(联合脊麻-硬膜外组镇痛前 0 例,镇痛后 7 例;硬膜外组镇痛前 0 例,镇痛后 8 例),加速率降低(p = 0.034)(联合脊麻-硬膜外组平均(SD)镇痛前 12.2(6.7)次/小时,镇痛后 9.9(6.1)次/小时;硬膜外组镇痛前 11.0(7.3)次/小时,镇痛后 8.4(5.9)次/小时)。这些胎儿心率变化并未影响该健康人群的新生儿结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验