Suppr超能文献

0.0015%他氟前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔无防腐剂固定复方制剂与成分联合使用的疗效、安全性及耐受性比较

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% versus concomitant use of the ingredients.

作者信息

Holló Gábor, Hommer Anton, Antón López Alfonso, Ropo Auli

机构信息

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary .

出版信息

J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug;30(6):468-75. doi: 10.1089/jop.2013.0229. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the preservative-free fixed combination (FC) and non-fixed combination (NFC) of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

This 6-month, prospective, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III study was performed in patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma with untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥23 and ≤36 mmHg at baseline.

RESULTS

Four hundred patients washed out from IOP-lowering medication were randomized, 201 received the FC, and 199 received the NFC. Mean time-wise IOP decreases from baseline ranged from -7.3 to -9.1 mmHg (29.6%-34.6%) in the FC and from -7.5 to -9.4 mmHg (30.7%-36.0%) in the NFC arm [per-protocol (PP) dataset, P<0.0001 compared with baseline for both groups]. At month 6, the estimated overall treatment difference (FC-NFC) was 0.308 mmHg (PP dataset, 95% confidence interval from -0.194 to 0.810 mmHg). An IOP decrease ≥30% was achieved in 58.3% and 66.9% of the patients in the FC and NFC groups, respectively (PP dataset; P=0.105); an IOP decrease ≥35% was achieved in 36.6% and 43.1% of patients in the FC and NFC groups, respectively (PP dataset; P=0.297). Patients with ocular adverse events were evenly distributed in both groups. The most common side effect, conjunctival/ocular hyperemia was found in 8% and 5% of patients in the FC and NFC arms, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All measures of IOP reduction for FC of preservative-free tafluprost/timolol were statistically and clinically significant and non-inferior to those of the NFC, throughout the 6-month study period.

摘要

目的

比较0.0015%他氟前列素和0.5%噻吗洛尔的无防腐剂固定组合(FC)与非固定组合(NFC)在开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

这项为期6个月的前瞻性、随机、双盲、活性对照、平行组、多中心III期研究纳入了基线时未经治疗的眼压(IOP)≥23且≤36 mmHg的高眼压症和开角型青光眼患者。

结果

400名停用降眼压药物的患者被随机分组,201人接受FC,199人接受NFC。FC组从基线开始的平均眼压随时间下降幅度为-7.3至-9.1 mmHg(29.6%-34.6%),NFC组为-7.5至-9.4 mmHg(30.7%-36.0%)[符合方案(PP)数据集,两组与基线相比P<0.0001]。在第6个月时,估计的总体治疗差异(FC-NFC)为0.308 mmHg(PP数据集,95%置信区间为-0.194至0.810 mmHg)。FC组和NFC组分别有58.3%和66.9%的患者眼压下降≥30%(PP数据集;P=0.105);FC组和NFC组分别有36.6%和43.1%的患者眼压下降≥35%(PP数据集;P=0.297)。眼部不良事件患者在两组中分布均匀。最常见的副作用,结膜/眼部充血,在FC组和NFC组中的发生率分别为8%和5%。

结论

在整个6个月的研究期间,无防腐剂他氟前列素/噻吗洛尔FC降低眼压的所有指标在统计学和临床上均有显著意义,且不劣于NFC。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验