• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹远端胃切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, PO Box 533, Wentworthville, NSW, 2145, Australia.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jun;18(6):1087-99. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2519-z. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-014-2519-z
PMID:24740486
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has been increasingly utilized in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma. This study aims to compare the morbidity/mortality and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy since 2000.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted including studies published between 2000 and present.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies with a total of 7,109 distal gastrectomies (3,496 lap vs 3,613 open) were included. Across all studies, postoperative morbidity rates for laparoscopic gastrectomy were lower than that of open [median (range) 10 (0-36) % vs 17 (0-43) %]. Meta-analysis of postoperative morbidity rates in prospective studies only yielded pooled odds ratio of 0.52 (95 % CI 0.33-0.81) (P = 0.004). In-hospital mortality rates were comparable between the two (range: laparoscopic 0-3.3 vs open 0-6.7 %). The long-term oncological outcomes of resection were difficult to analyze given variable reporting but appeared similar between the two. Meta-analysis of prospective studies showed that laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy was associated with significantly shorter hospital length of stay [standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.78 (95 % CI = -1.0 to -0.56)], comparable intraoperative bleeding [SMD = 0.64 (95 % CI = -1.3-0.0430) P = 0.066] and longer operative time compared to open gastrectomy [1.9 (95 % CI 0.05-3.8) P = 0.045, with P < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma with evidence of comparable, if not better, short-term postoperative parameters when compared to open distal gastrectomy. The long-term oncological outcomes appear similar but may require more evaluation.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术已越来越多地应用于胃腺癌的治疗。本研究旨在比较 2000 年以来腹腔镜辅助与开放远端胃切除术的发病率/死亡率和术后结果。

方法

对 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行了全面检索,包括 2000 年至目前发表的研究。

结果

共纳入 17 项研究,总计 7109 例远端胃切除术(3496 例腹腔镜 vs 3613 例开放)。所有研究中,腹腔镜胃切除术的术后发病率均低于开放手术[中位数(范围)10(0-36)% vs 17(0-43)%]。仅对前瞻性研究进行术后发病率的荟萃分析得出的合并优势比为 0.52(95%CI 0.33-0.81)(P=0.004)。两种手术的院内死亡率相当(腹腔镜 0-3.3% vs 开放 0-6.7%)。由于报告的结果存在差异,难以分析两种手术的长期肿瘤学结果,但似乎相似。对前瞻性研究的荟萃分析显示,腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与较短的住院时间相关[标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.78(95%CI=-1.0 至-0.56)],术中出血量相当[SMD=0.64(95%CI=-1.3-0.0430)P=0.066],与开放胃切除术相比,手术时间更长[1.9(95%CI 0.05-3.8)P=0.045,P<0.001]。

结论

本研究支持将腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术用于胃腺癌的治疗,与开放远端胃切除术相比,具有短期术后参数相似甚至更好的证据。长期肿瘤学结果似乎相似,但可能需要更多的评估。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jun;18(6):1087-99. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2519-z. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
2
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011389. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011389.pub2.
3
[Safety and efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis].手辅助腹腔镜与开放远端胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 25;20(3):320-325.
4
Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开腹远端胃癌切除术治疗进展期胃癌:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Feb;23(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182747af7.
5
Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的近期和远期疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 24;20(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02818-5.
6
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 2495 patients.机器人手术与腹腔镜胃癌切除术短期临床结局的比较:2495例患者的荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Dec;23(12):965-76. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0279. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
7
Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌:随机和非随机临床试验证据。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.腹腔镜与开放远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺癌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2.
9
Robotic vs laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Billroth I and II reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜远端胃切除术行毕罗Ⅰ式和Ⅱ式重建的系统评价与Meta分析
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02193-1.
10
Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.欧洲微创与开放胃癌切除术的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Scand J Surg. 2017 Mar;106(1):3-20. doi: 10.1177/1457496916630654. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications Following Open Versus Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma.胃腺癌开放手术与微创手术切除后的并发症
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;131(7):1302-1312. doi: 10.1002/jso.28073. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure.成人腹部腹腔镜手术中的深度神经肌肉阻滞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 30;1(1):CD013197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013197.pub2.
3
Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study.腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术与开腹远端胃切除术的比较:一项前瞻性随机单盲研究。
World J Surg. 2013 Oct;37(10):2379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2121-7.
2
Outcomes after laparoscopic or open distal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Apr;257(4):640-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826fd541.
3
Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.
腹腔镜与开腹胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Jul 18;27(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00748-2.
4
[Reconstruction following gastrectomy].[胃癌切除术后重建]
Chirurg. 2021 Jun;92(6):506-514. doi: 10.1007/s00104-020-01350-0. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
5
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr 15;17(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1600-1.
6
Efficacy of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in elderly patients.全腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术治疗老年胃癌患者的疗效
Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;4(6):976-982. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.843. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Oncologic value of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的肿瘤学价值:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):199-208. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181283.
8
Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The LOC-1 Study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗临床I期胃癌的长期结果:LOC-1研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Aug;264(2):214-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001654.
9
Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年胃癌患者腹腔镜胃切除术与开放胃切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 31;14:90. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0859-8.
10
Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.机器人手术:颠覆性创新还是未兑现的承诺?对前30年的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4330-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4752-x. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌:随机和非随机临床试验证据。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
4
Surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case-control study.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术的手术效果比较:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1956-y. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
5
Learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy using a standardized surgical technique and an established educational system.腹腔镜辅助胃切除术的学习曲线:使用标准化手术技术和既定的教育体系。
Scand J Surg. 2011;100(2):86-91. doi: 10.1177/145749691110000204.
6
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to open distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助与开腹远端胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的疗效比较。
Dig Surg. 2011;28(4):245-51. doi: 10.1159/000328658. Epub 2011 Jun 3.
7
Assessment of quality of life after gastrectomy using EORTC QLQ-C30 and STO22.使用 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 STO22 评估胃切除术后的生活质量。
World J Surg. 2011 Feb;35(2):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0860-2.
8
Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜辅助 D2 根治性远端胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌。
Dig Surg. 2010;27(4):291-6. doi: 10.1159/000281818. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
9
Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a monoinstitutional Western center experience.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术的单中心比较:西方单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):140-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1147-2. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
10
Evaluation of a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for patients preoperatively diagnosed with early gastric cancer located in the middle third of the stomach.评价保留幽门的胃切除术用于术前诊断位于胃中三分之一的早期胃癌患者。
Surg Today. 2010 Mar;40(3):228-33. doi: 10.1007/s00595-009-4043-4. Epub 2010 Feb 24.