University Hospital Ayr, Departmentof Trauma & Orthopaedics, DalmellingtonRoad, Ayr, UK.
Bone Joint Res. 2014 Apr 16;3(4):108-16. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.34.2000230. Print 2014.
Mortality rates reported by the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) were higher following cemented total knee replacement (TKR) compared with uncemented procedures. The aim of this study is to examine and compare the effects of cemented and uncemented TKR on the activation of selected markers of inflammation, endothelium, and coagulation, and on the activation of selected cytokines involved in the various aspects of the systemic response following surgery.
This was a single centre, prospective, case-control study. Following enrolment, blood samples were taken pre-operatively, and further samples were collected at day one and day seven post-operatively. One patient in the cemented group developed a deep-vein thrombosis confirmed on ultrasonography and was excluded, leaving 19 patients in this cohort (mean age 67.4, (sd 10.62)), and one patient in the uncemented group developed a post-operative wound infection and was excluded, leaving 19 patients (mean age 66.5, (sd 7.82)).
Both groups had a similar response with regards to the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα). CD40 levels rose significantly on the cemented group over day one to day seven compared with that of the uncemented group, which occurred over the first 24 hours. The CD14/42a levels demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the cemented group (p < 0.001 first 24 hours and p = 0.02 between days one and seven).
The uncemented and cemented groups demonstrated significant changes in the various parameters measured at various time points but apart from CD14/42a levels, there was no significant difference in the serum markers of inflammation, coagulation and endothelial dysfunction following cemented TKR. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:108-16.
英格兰和威尔士国家联合注册处(NJR)报告的死亡率在使用骨水泥固定的全膝关节置换术(TKR)后高于非骨水泥固定的 TKR。本研究旨在检查和比较骨水泥固定与非骨水泥固定 TKR 对选定炎症、内皮和凝血标志物的激活作用,以及对手术相关的全身反应各个方面所涉及的选定细胞因子的激活作用。
这是一项单中心前瞻性病例对照研究。入组后,在术前采集血样,术后第 1 天和第 7 天采集进一步的血样。骨水泥组有 1 例患者经超声证实发生深静脉血栓形成,被排除在外,该组留下 19 例患者(平均年龄 67.4 岁,(标准差 10.62 岁)),而非骨水泥组有 1 例患者术后发生伤口感染,被排除在外,该组留下 19 例患者(平均年龄 66.5 岁,(标准差 7.82 岁))。
两组在 C 反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素 6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNFα)水平方面均有相似的反应。与非骨水泥组相比,骨水泥组的 CD40 水平在第 1 天至第 7 天显著升高,而非骨水泥组则在第 24 小时内升高。CD14/42a 水平在骨水泥组中呈统计学显著升高(第 1 天至第 24 小时内 p < 0.001,第 1 天至第 7 天之间 p = 0.02)。
非骨水泥固定组和骨水泥固定组在各个时间点测量的各项参数均发生显著变化,但除 CD14/42a 水平外,骨水泥固定 TKR 后炎症、凝血和内皮功能障碍的血清标志物无显著差异。
Bone Joint Res. 2014;3:108-16.