Clinical Neurophysiology, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands ; Department of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital , Arnhem , Netherlands.
Clinical Neurophysiology, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente , Enschede , Netherlands ; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente , Enschede , Netherlands.
Front Neurol. 2014 Mar 31;5:39. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00039. eCollection 2014.
Electroencephalographic status epilepticus occurs in 9-35% of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Mortality is 90-100%. It is unclear whether (some) seizure patterns represent a condition in which anti-epileptic treatment may improve outcome, or severe ischemic damage, in which treatment is futile. We explored current treatment practice and its effect on patients' outcome.
We retrospectively identified patients that were treated with anti-epileptic drugs from our prospective cohort study on the value of continuous electroencephalography (EEG) in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Outcome at 6 months was dichotomized between "good" [cerebral performance category (CPC) 1 or 2] and "poor" (CPC 3, 4, or 5). EEG analyses were done at 24 h after cardiac arrest and during anti-epileptic treatment. Unequivocal seizures and generalized periodic discharges during more than 30 min were classified as status epilepticus.
Thirty-one (22%) out of 139 patients were treated with anti-epileptic drugs (phenytoin, levetiracetam, valproate, clonazepam, propofol, midazolam), of whom 24 had status epilepticus. Dosages were moderate, barbiturates were not used, medication induced burst-suppression not achieved, and treatment improved electroencephalographic status epilepticus patterns temporarily (<6 h). Twenty-three patients treated for status epilepticus (96%) died. In patients with status epilepticus at 24 h, there was no difference in outcome between those treated with and without anti-epileptic drugs.
In comatose patients after cardiac arrest complicated by electroencephalographic status epilepticus, current practice includes unstandardized, moderate treatment with anti-epileptic drugs. Although widely used, this does probably not improve patients' outcome. A randomized controlled trial to estimate the effect of standardized, aggressive treatment, directed at complete suppression of epileptiform activity during at least 24 h, is needed and in preparation.
心脏骤停后昏迷患者中,9-35%发生癫痫持续状态。死亡率为 90-100%。目前尚不清楚(某些)癫痫发作模式是否代表一种情况,即抗癫痫治疗可能改善预后,或代表严重的缺血性损伤,治疗无效。我们探讨了目前的治疗实践及其对患者预后的影响。
我们从心脏骤停后昏迷患者连续脑电图(EEG)价值的前瞻性队列研究中回顾性确定接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者。6 个月时的预后分为“良好”[脑功能分类(CPC)1 或 2]和“不良”(CPC 3、4 或 5)。EEG 分析在心脏骤停后 24 小时和抗癫痫治疗期间进行。超过 30 分钟出现明确癫痫发作和全面性周期性放电被归类为癫痫持续状态。
在 139 例患者中,有 31 例(22%)接受了抗癫痫药物治疗(苯妥英钠、左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸钠、氯硝西泮、丙泊酚、咪达唑仑),其中 24 例发生癫痫持续状态。剂量适中,未使用巴比妥类药物,药物诱导的爆发抑制未达到,治疗暂时改善(<6 小时)脑电图癫痫持续状态模式。接受癫痫持续状态治疗的 23 例患者(96%)死亡。在 24 小时出现癫痫持续状态的患者中,接受和未接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者预后无差异。
在心脏骤停后并发脑电图癫痫持续状态的昏迷患者中,目前的治疗包括使用抗癫痫药物进行不规范、中度治疗。尽管广泛使用,但这可能并不能改善患者的预后。需要并正在准备一项随机对照试验,以评估标准化、强化治疗的效果,该治疗旨在至少 24 小时内完全抑制癫痫样活动。