Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Brain Res. 2014 Jun 3;1567:42-56. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
Speech-associated gesturing leads to memory advantages for spoken sentences. However, unexpected or surprising events are also likely to be remembered. With this study we test the hypothesis that different neural mechanisms (semantic elaboration and surprise) lead to memory advantages for iconic and unrelated gestures. During fMRI-data acquisition participants were presented with video clips of an actor verbalising concrete sentences accompanied by iconic gestures (IG; e.g., circular gesture; sentence: "The man is sitting at the round table"), unrelated free gestures (FG; e.g., unrelated up down movements; same sentence) and no gestures (NG; same sentence). After scanning, recognition performance for the three conditions was tested. Videos were evaluated regarding semantic relation and surprise by a different group of participants. The semantic relationship between speech and gesture was rated higher for IG (IG>FG), whereas surprise was rated higher for FG (FG>IG). Activation of the hippocampus correlated with subsequent memory performance of both gesture conditions (IG+FG>NG). For the IG condition we found activation in the left temporal pole and middle cingulate cortex (MCC; IG>FG). In contrast, for the FG condition posterior thalamic structures (FG>IG) as well as anterior and posterior cingulate cortices were activated (FG>NG). Our behavioral and fMRI-data suggest different mechanisms for processing related and unrelated co-verbal gestures, both of them leading to enhanced memory performance. Whereas activation in MCC and left temporal pole for iconic co-verbal gestures may reflect semantic memory processes, memory enhancement for unrelated gestures relies on the surprise response, mediated by anterior/posterior cingulate cortex and thalamico-hippocampal structures.
言语伴随的手势会为口语句子带来记忆优势。然而,出乎意料或令人惊讶的事件也可能被记住。在这项研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即不同的神经机制(语义细化和惊讶)会导致形象化和不相关的手势具有记忆优势。在 fMRI 数据采集期间,参与者观看了演员口头表达具体句子并伴有形象化手势(IG;例如,圆形手势;句子:“The man is sitting at the round table”)、不相关的自由手势(FG;例如,无关的上下运动;相同的句子)和无手势(NG;相同的句子)的视频片段。扫描后,测试了参与者对这三种条件的记忆表现。视频由另一组参与者评估语义关系和惊喜度。言语和手势之间的语义关系在 IG 中被评为更高(IG>FG),而在 FG 中被评为更高的是惊喜度(FG>IG)。海马体的激活与两种手势条件(IG+FG>NG)的后续记忆表现相关。对于 IG 条件,我们在左侧颞极和中扣带回皮层(MCC;IG>FG)中发现了激活。相比之下,对于 FG 条件,后丘脑结构(FG>IG)以及前后扣带回皮层(FG>NG)被激活。我们的行为和 fMRI 数据表明,处理相关和不相关的伴随手势的机制不同,这两种机制都能提高记忆表现。对于形象化的伴随手势,MCC 和左侧颞极的激活可能反映了语义记忆过程,而不相关手势的记忆增强则依赖于惊喜反应,由前后扣带回皮层和丘脑-海马结构介导。