• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对各种心血管疾病干预措施的成本效益进行建模时面临的挑战。

Challenges in modelling the cost effectiveness of various interventions for cardiovascular disease.

作者信息

Burgers Laura T, Redekop William K, Severens Johan L

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jul;32(7):627-37. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0155-9.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-014-0155-9
PMID:24748448
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Decision analytic modelling is essential in performing cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of interventions in cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, modelling inherently poses challenges that need to be dealt with since models always represent a simplification of reality. The aim of this study was to identify and explore the challenges in modelling CVD interventions.

METHODS

A document analysis was performed of 40 model-based CEAs of CVD interventions published in high-impact journals. We analysed the systematically selected papers to identify challenges per type of intervention (test, non-drug, drug, disease management programme, and public health intervention), and a questionnaire was sent to the corresponding authors to obtain a more thorough overview. Ideas for possible solutions for the challenges were based on the papers, responses, modelling guidelines, and other sources.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search identified 1,720 potentially relevant articles. Forty authors were identified after screening the most recent 294 papers. Besides the challenge of lack of data, the challenges encountered in the review suggest that it was difficult to obtain a sufficiently valid and accurate cost-effectiveness estimate, mainly due to lack of data or extrapolating from intermediate outcomes. Despite the low response rate of the questionnaire, it confirmed our results.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of a review and a survey showed examples of CVD modelling challenges found in studies published in high-impact journals. Modelling guidelines do not provide sufficient guidance in resolving all challenges. Some of the reported challenges are specific to the type of intervention and disease, while some are independent of intervention and disease.

摘要

目的

决策分析模型对于开展心血管疾病(CVD)干预措施的成本效益分析(CEA)至关重要。然而,建模本身带来了一些需要应对的挑战,因为模型始终是对现实的简化。本研究的目的是识别和探讨CVD干预措施建模中的挑战。

方法

对发表在高影响力期刊上的40篇基于模型的CVD干预措施CEA进行了文献分析。我们系统地分析了所选论文,以确定每种干预类型(检测、非药物、药物、疾病管理计划和公共卫生干预)的挑战,并向通讯作者发送了一份问卷,以获得更全面的概述。基于论文、回复、建模指南和其他来源,提出了应对这些挑战的可能解决方案。

结果

系统文献检索确定了1720篇潜在相关文章。在筛选了最近的294篇论文后,确定了40位作者。除了数据缺乏的挑战外,综述中遇到的挑战表明,主要由于缺乏数据或从中期结果进行推断,很难获得足够有效和准确的成本效益估计。尽管问卷回复率较低,但证实了我们的结果。

结论

这项综述和调查相结合的研究展示了在高影响力期刊发表的研究中发现的CVD建模挑战的实例。建模指南在解决所有挑战方面没有提供足够的指导。一些报告的挑战特定于干预类型和疾病,而一些则与干预和疾病无关。

相似文献

1
Challenges in modelling the cost effectiveness of various interventions for cardiovascular disease.对各种心血管疾病干预措施的成本效益进行建模时面临的挑战。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jul;32(7):627-37. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0155-9.
2
Economic modelling of diagnostic and treatment pathways in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines: the Modelling Algorithm Pathways in Guidelines (MAPGuide) project.经济建模在英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所临床指南中的诊断和治疗路径:指南中的建模算法路径(MAPGuide)项目。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Dec;17(58):v-vi, 1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta17580.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
5
Systematic review of model-based analyses reporting the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cardiovascular disease management programs.基于模型分析的关于心血管疾病管理项目成本效益和成本效用报告的系统评价。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1177/1474515114536093. Epub 2014 May 16.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.卫生技术评估中决策分析模型良好实践指南综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta8360.
8
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.压力性尿失禁女性的外科治疗:ESTER系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140.
9
Are Current Reporting Standards Used to Describe Health State Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Models Satisfactory?当前用于描述成本效益模型中健康状态效用的报告标准是否令人满意?
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
10
Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis.助力行动能力受限的非常年幼儿童参与和积极发展的电动移动干预措施:EMPOWER 证据综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(50):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta24500.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-benefit analysis of kidney transplant in patients with chronic kidney disease: a case study in Iran.慢性肾病患者肾移植的成本效益分析:伊朗的一个案例研究
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jul 29;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00372-1.
2
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a community based CVD program in Sweden based on a retrospective register cohort.基于回顾性登记队列的瑞典社区 CVD 项目的成本效益分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;18(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5339-3.
3
Using meta-regression analyses in addition to conventional systematic review methods to examine the variation in cost-effectiveness results - a case study.

本文引用的文献

1
The cloudy crystal ball of cost-effectiveness studies.成本效益研究的朦胧水晶球。
Value Health. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(6):1100-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.012.
2
Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer's checklist.决策证据综合 7:审稿人检查表。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):679-91. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13485156.
3
Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis.证据综合决策 6:将证据综合嵌入概率成本效益分析中。
除常规系统评价方法外,使用Meta回归分析来检验成本效益结果的差异——一项案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 20;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1230-4.
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):671-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13487257.
4
Evidence synthesis for decision making 5: the baseline natural history model.循证决策 5:基线自然史模型。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):657-70. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13485155.
5
Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials.证据综合决策 4:基于随机对照试验的证据网络中的不一致性。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):641-56. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12455847.
6
Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity--subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustment.循证决策 3:异质性——亚组、Meta 回归、偏倚和偏倚调整。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):618-40. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13485157.
7
Evidence synthesis for decision making 1: introduction.循证决策 1:引言。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):597-606. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13487604.
8
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 May;31(5):361-7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0032-y.
9
Systematic review of the accuracy of dual-source cardiac CT for detection of arterial stenosis in difficult to image patient groups.双源心脏 CT 检测成像困难患者组动脉狭窄准确性的系统评价。
Radiology. 2013 May;267(2):387-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121136. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
10
Acknowledging patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation : a systematic literature review.承认经济评估中的患者异质性:系统文献回顾。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Feb;31(2):111-23. doi: 10.1007/s40273-012-0015-4.