Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;18(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5339-3.
Several large scale community-based cardiovascular disease prevention programs were initiated in the 80s, and one was the Västerbotten Intervention Programme, Sweden. As an initial step in 1985, a pilot study was introduced in the Norsjö municipality that combined individual disease prevention efforts among the middle-aged population with community-oriented health promotion activities. All citizens at 30, 40, 50, and 60 years of age were invited to a physical examination combined with a healthy dialogue at the local primary health care centre. Västerbotten Intervention Program is still running following the same lines and is now a part of the ordinary public health in the county. The purpose of this study is to estimate the costs of running Västerbotten Intervention Programme from 1990 to 2006, versus the health gains and savings reasonably attributable to the program during the same time period.
A previous study estimated the number of prevented deaths during the period 1990-2006 which can be attributed to the programme. We used this estimate and calculated the number of QALYs gained, as well as savings in resources due to prevented non-fatal cases during the time period 1990 to 2006. Costs for the programmes were based on previously published scientific articles as well as current cost data from the county council, who is responsible for the programme.
The cost per QALY gained from a societal perspective is SEK 650 (Euro 68). From a health care sector perspective, the savings attributable to the VIP exceeded its costs.
Our analysis shows that Västerbotten Intervention Programme is extremely cost-effective in relation to the Swedish threshold value (SEK 500000 per QALY gained or Euro 53,000 per QALY gained). Other research has also shown a favorable effect of Västerbotten Intervention Programme on population health and the health gap. We therefore argue that all health care organizations, acting in settings reasonably similar to Sweden, have good incentive to implement programs like Västerbotten Intervention Programme.
80 年代启动了几项大规模的基于社区的心血管疾病预防计划,其中一项是瑞典的韦斯特博滕干预计划。作为 1985 年的初步步骤,在诺尔雪平市引入了一项试点研究,该研究将中年人群的个体疾病预防工作与面向社区的健康促进活动相结合。所有 30、40、50 和 60 岁的公民都被邀请到当地初级保健中心进行体检,并进行健康对话。韦斯特博滕干预计划仍在按照同样的路线进行,现在是该县普通公共卫生的一部分。本研究的目的是估算从 1990 年到 2006 年运行韦斯特博滕干预计划的成本,以及同期该计划合理归因于健康收益和节省的成本。
先前的一项研究估计了 1990-2006 年期间可归因于该计划的预防死亡人数。我们使用此估计值计算了在此期间获得的 QALY 数量,以及由于预防非致命病例而节省的资源数量。该计划的成本基于先前发表的科学文章以及负责该计划的县议会的当前成本数据。
从社会角度来看,每获得一个 QALY 的成本为 650 瑞典克朗(68 欧元)。从医疗保健部门的角度来看,VIP 的节省额超过了其成本。
我们的分析表明,与瑞典的阈值(每获得一个 QALY 获得 500000 瑞典克朗或每获得一个 QALY 获得 53000 欧元)相比,韦斯特博滕干预计划具有极高的成本效益。其他研究还表明,韦斯特博滕干预计划对人口健康和健康差距产生了有利影响。因此,我们认为,所有医疗保健组织在与瑞典类似的环境中运作,都有很好的激励措施来实施像韦斯特博滕干预计划这样的计划。