Joseph Robert M, Fricker Zachary, Keehn Brandon
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E. Concord St., Boston, MA, 02118, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114 and Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 1 Autumn St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E. Concord St., Boston, MA, 02118, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114 and Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 1 Autumn St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E. Concord St., Boston, MA, 02118, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114 and Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 1 Autumn St., Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Feb;10(2):294-301. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsu054. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
Gaze and arrow cues automatically orient visual attention, even when they have no predictive value, but the neural circuitry by which they direct attention is not clear. Recent evidence has indicated that the ventral frontoparietal attention network is primarily engaged by breaches of a viewer's cue-related expectations. Accordingly, we hypothesized that to the extent that non-predictive gaze and arrow cues automatically engender expectations with regard to cue location, they should activate the ventral attention network when they cue attention invalidly. Using event-related fMRI, we found that invalid gaze but not arrow cues activated the ventral attention network, specifically in the area of the right temporal parietal junction (TPJ), as well as nodes along the dorsal attention network associated with a redirection of attention to the correct target location. In additional whole-brain analyses, facilitation of behavioral response time by valid gaze cues was linearly associated with the degree of activation in the right TPJ. We conclude from our findings that gaze direction elicits potent expectations in humans with regard to an actor's intention that engage attention networks if not differently from, at least more robustly than, arrow cues.
注视和箭头线索会自动引导视觉注意力,即使它们没有预测价值,但其引导注意力的神经回路尚不清楚。最近的证据表明,腹侧额顶叶注意力网络主要由违背观察者与线索相关的预期所激活。因此,我们推测,就非预测性的注视和箭头线索会自动引发关于线索位置的预期而言,当它们无效地引导注意力时,应该会激活腹侧注意力网络。使用事件相关功能磁共振成像,我们发现无效的注视线索而非箭头线索激活了腹侧注意力网络,特别是在右侧颞顶联合区(TPJ),以及与注意力重新定向到正确目标位置相关的背侧注意力网络中的节点。在额外的全脑分析中,有效注视线索对行为反应时间的促进作用与右侧TPJ的激活程度呈线性相关。我们从研究结果中得出结论,注视方向会在人类中引发对行为者意图的强烈预期,这种预期至少与箭头线索一样强烈地,甚至可能以不同方式,激活注意力网络。