Suppr超能文献

基于系统基因组学数据的扁盘动物并系发生支持螺旋动物具有无体腔的祖先。

Platyzoan paraphyly based on phylogenomic data supports a noncoelomate ancestry of spiralia.

机构信息

Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, GermanyUniversity of Osnabrück, FB05 Biology/Chemistry, AG Zoology, Osnabrück, Germany

Institute of Molecular Genetics, Biosafety Research and Consulting, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Jul;31(7):1833-49. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu143. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

Abstract

Based on molecular data three major clades have been recognized within Bilateria: Deuterostomia, Ecdysozoa, and Spiralia. Within Spiralia, small-sized and simply organized animals such as flatworms, gastrotrichs, and gnathostomulids have recently been grouped together as Platyzoa. However, the representation of putative platyzoans was low in the respective molecular phylogenetic studies, in terms of both, taxon number and sequence data. Furthermore, increased substitution rates in platyzoan taxa raised the possibility that monophyletic Platyzoa represents an artifact due to long-branch attraction. In order to overcome such problems, we employed a phylogenomic approach, thereby substantially increasing 1) the number of sampled species within Platyzoa and 2) species-specific sequence coverage in data sets of up to 82,162 amino acid positions. Using established and new measures (long-branch score), we disentangled phylogenetic signal from misleading effects such as long-branch attraction. In doing so, our phylogenomic analyses did not recover a monophyletic origin of platyzoan taxa that, instead, appeared paraphyletic with respect to the other spiralians. Platyhelminthes and Gastrotricha formed a monophylum, which we name Rouphozoa. To the exclusion of Gnathifera, Rouphozoa and all other spiralians represent a monophyletic group, which we name Platytrochozoa. Platyzoan paraphyly suggests that the last common ancestor of Spiralia was a simple-bodied organism lacking coelomic cavities, segmentation, and complex brain structures, and that more complex animals such as annelids evolved from such a simply organized ancestor. This conclusion contradicts alternative evolutionary scenarios proposing an annelid-like ancestor of Bilateria and Spiralia and several independent events of secondary reduction.

摘要

基于分子数据,后生动物中已经识别出三个主要的分支:后口动物、蜕皮动物和螺旋动物。在螺旋动物中,扁形动物、腹毛动物和颚胃动物等体型较小且结构简单的动物最近被归为扁形动物。然而,在各自的分子系统发育研究中,扁形动物的代表物种数量较少,无论是在分类单元数量还是序列数据方面。此外,扁形动物类群的替代率增加,使得单系的扁形动物可能是由于长枝吸引而产生的假象。为了解决这些问题,我们采用了基因组学方法,从而大幅增加了 1)扁形动物内采样物种的数量和 2)数据集内每个物种的序列覆盖度,最高可达 82162 个氨基酸位置。我们使用了已建立的和新的度量标准(长枝得分),从长枝吸引等误导性影响中分离出了系统发育信号。通过这样做,我们的基因组学分析没有恢复出扁形动物类群的单系起源,相反,它们相对于其他螺旋动物表现出并系关系。扁形动物门和腹毛动物门形成了一个单系群,我们将其命名为 Rouphozoa。除了颚胃动物门,Rouphozoa 和所有其他螺旋动物代表一个单系群,我们将其命名为 Platytrochozoa。扁形动物的并系关系表明,螺旋动物的最后共同祖先可能是一个没有体腔腔、分节和复杂大脑结构的简单体型生物,而像环节动物这样更复杂的动物是从这样一个简单组织的祖先进化而来的。这一结论与替代的进化情景相矛盾,这些情景提出后生动物和螺旋动物的环节动物样祖先以及几个独立的二次简化事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验