University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota , USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2002 Dec 1;1(4):115-21. eCollection 2002 Dec.
This study was designed to 1) determine the relative frequency of occurrence of a heart rate deflection point (HRDP), when compared to a linear relationship, during progressive exercise, 2) measure the reproducibility of a visual assessment of a heart rate deflection point (HRDP), both within and between observers 3) compare visual and computer-assessed deflection points. Subjects consisted of 73 competitive male cyclists with mean age of 31.4 ± 6.3 years, mean height 178.3 ± 4.8 cm. and weight 74.0 ± 4.4 kg. Tests were conducted on an electrically-braked cycle ergometer beginning at 25 watts and progressing 25 watts per minute to fatigue. Heart Rates were recorded the last 10 seconds of each stage and at fatigue. Scatter plots of heart rate versus watts were computer-generated and given to 3 observers on two different occasions. A computer program was developed to assess if data points were best represented by a single line or two lines. The HRDP represented the intersection of the two lines. Results of this study showed that 1) computer-assessed HRDP showed that 44 of 73 subjects (60.3%) had scatter plots best represented by a straight line with no HRDP 2)in those subjects having HRDP, all 3 observers showed significant differences(p = 0.048, p = 0.007, p = 0.001) in reproducibility of their HRDP selection. Differences in HRDP selection were significant for two of the three comparisons between observers (p = 0.002, p = 0.305, p = 0.0003) Computer-generated HRDP was significantly different than visual HRDP for 2 of 3 observers (p = 0.0016, p = 0.513, p = 0.0001). It is concluded that 1) HRDP occurs in a minority of subjects 2) significant differences exist, both within and between observers, in selection of HRDP and 3) differences in agreement between visual and computer-generated HRDP would indicate that, when HRDP exists, it should be computer-assessed.
1)确定在递增运动过程中,与线性关系相比,心率偏移点(HRDP)出现的相对频率;2)测量在观察者内部和之间,对心率偏移点(HRDP)进行视觉评估的可重复性;3)比较视觉和计算机评估的偏移点。研究对象为 73 名具有平均年龄 31.4 ± 6.3 岁、平均身高 178.3 ± 4.8cm 和体重 74.0 ± 4.4kg 的竞技男性自行车手。测试在电动制动的自行车测功机上进行,起始功率为 25 瓦,每 25 瓦递增至疲劳。在每个阶段的最后 10 秒和疲劳时记录心率。心率与瓦特的散点图由计算机生成,并在两次不同的场合提供给 3 名观察者。开发了一个计算机程序来评估数据点是否最好由一条线或两条线表示。HRDP 代表两条线的交点。这项研究的结果表明:1)计算机评估的 HRDP 显示,在 73 名受试者中有 44 名(60.3%)的散点图最好由没有 HRDP 的直线表示;2)在有 HRDP 的受试者中,所有 3 名观察者在其 HRDP 选择的可重复性方面均显示出显著差异(p = 0.048,p = 0.007,p = 0.001)。观察者之间的三次比较中有两次(p = 0.002,p = 0.305,p = 0.0003),HRDP 选择的差异具有统计学意义。对于 3 名观察者中的 2 名(p = 0.0016,p = 0.513,p = 0.0001),计算机生成的 HRDP 与视觉 HRDP 存在显著差异。结论是:1)HRDP 仅在少数受试者中出现;2)在观察者内部和之间,在 HRDP 的选择上存在显著差异;3)视觉和计算机生成的 HRDP 之间的一致性差异表明,当 HRDP 存在时,应进行计算机评估。