Bourgois J, Vrijens J
Centre of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Int J Sports Med. 1998 Nov;19(8):553-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971959.
In order to examine the validity of Conconi's heart rate threshold (ATHR) during rowing ergometry, in accordance with the new recommendations of Conconi, ten young rowers (age 17.5 [SD 1.7] years; height 182.5 [SD 5.9]cm; body mass 77.0 [SD 10.6] kg) were submitted - at random and within 48-72 h - to two progressive incremental exercise tests on a rowing ergometer. In the first test, the heart rate threshold (ATHR) was determined during a ramp-like incremental test. In a second test, the lactate method (150W + 50W x 3 min(-1)) was used to determine the 4 mmol x l(-1) threshold (AT4) and the individual anaerobic threshold (IAT). Subsequently, each subject performed within 48-72 h after the second progressive incremental exercise test a 30 min prolonged exercise test (PET) at the power output corresponding to ATHR to demonstrate whether or not a steady state in blood lactate concentration ([La-]bSS) could be maintained. Friedmann's analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) were used as statistical tools. Significant lower values for power output (p < 0.01 ) and heart rate (HR) (p < 0.01) were found at IAT as compared to AT4 and ATHR. No relationships were found between ATHR on the one hand and AT4 and IATon the other hand, neither for power output (rs=0.27 and -0.09), nor for HR (rs=0.08 and -0.08). Coefficients of correlation between AT4 and IAT were respectively 0.68 (p < 0.05) for power output and 0.79 (p < 0.01) for HR. During PET only four out of 10 rowers reached the target time of 30 min at ATHR power output and only one rower showed a lactate steady state. From our results we can conclude that power output at ATHR is overestimated and cannot be used for the prescription of endurance training in rowing. The ATHR does not reflect the anaerobic threshold and is therefore not relevant for monitoring continuous endurance training in rowing.
为了根据康科尼的新建议,检验康科尼心率阈值(无氧阈心率)在划船测功仪测试中的有效性,随机选取了10名年轻赛艇运动员(年龄17.5[标准差1.7]岁;身高182.5[标准差5.9]厘米;体重77.0[标准差10.6]千克),并在48 - 72小时内,让他们在划船测功仪上进行两次递增负荷运动测试。在第一次测试中,通过类似斜坡的递增测试来确定心率阈值(无氧阈心率)。在第二次测试中,采用乳酸法(150瓦 + 50瓦×3分钟⁻¹)来确定4毫摩尔×升⁻¹阈值(无氧阈4)和个体无氧阈(个体无氧阈)。随后,在第二次递增负荷运动测试后的48 - 72小时内,每位受试者在对应无氧阈心率的功率输出下进行30分钟的延长运动测试(PET),以证明是否能维持血乳酸浓度([La⁻]bSS)的稳定状态。采用弗里德曼方差分析、威尔科克森符号秩检验和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(rs)作为统计工具。与无氧阈4和无氧阈心率相比,个体无氧阈时的功率输出(p < 0.01)和心率(HR)(p < 0.01)显著更低。一方面,无氧阈心率与另一方面的无氧阈4和个体无氧阈之间,无论是功率输出(rs = 0.27和 - 0.09)还是心率(rs = 0.08和 - 0.08),均未发现相关性。无氧阈4和个体无氧阈之间,功率输出的相关系数为0.68(p < 0.05),心率的相关系数为0.79(p < 0.01)。在延长运动测试中,10名赛艇运动员中只有4人在无氧阈心率功率输出下达到了30分钟的目标时间,只有1名运动员表现出血乳酸稳定状态。从我们的结果可以得出结论,无氧阈心率时的功率输出被高估,不能用于划船耐力训练的处方制定。无氧阈心率不能反映无氧阈,因此与监测划船持续耐力训练无关。