Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014 Mar;85(1):14-9. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.872932.
This commentary was written in response to the Rink (2013), McKenzie and Lounsbery (2013), and Ward (2013) articles published earlier on teacher effectiveness in physical education (PE). The historical analyses of teacher effectiveness research in PE (TER-PE) presented in those 3 articles are briefly described, particularly as they represent a collective agenda in the first 3 decades in this line of inquiry. That collective agenda was primarily driven by physical education researchers and P-12 teachers, who developed and explored empirically based best practices for effective teaching and learning in physical education, which informed much of the content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge learned in physical education teacher education programs. Based on 2 recent policy developments in many states, external threats to the previous agenda for TER-PE are presented by the author, who concedes that the lead for the future agenda for TER-PE will soon be taken out of the hands of researchers, teachers, and teacher educators and transferred to educational agencies in the form of new policies on initial teacher certification and the evaluation of in-service teachers in a growing number of states.
本评论是对林克(2013 年)、麦肯齐和朗斯伯里(2013 年)以及沃德(2013 年)三篇早前发表的关于体育教育(PE)中教师效能的文章的回应。这 3 篇文章简要介绍了体育教育教师效能研究(TER-PE)的历史分析,尤其是它们代表了该研究领域前 30 年的集体议程。这一集体议程主要由体育教育研究人员和 P-12 教师推动,他们制定并探索了体育教育中有效教学和学习的基于实证的最佳实践,这些实践为体育教育教师教育计划中所学到的许多内容知识和教学内容知识提供了信息。基于最近在许多州出现的两项政策发展,作者提出了对 TER-PE 先前议程的外部威胁,他承认,TER-PE 的未来议程的主导权将很快从研究人员、教师和教师教育者手中转移到教育机构,以新的初始教师认证政策和对越来越多州在职教师的评估的形式。