• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何解决生命周期清单中的数据空白问题:以全球范围内估算燃煤电厂 CO2 排放为例。

How to address data gaps in life cycle inventories: a case study on estimating CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity plants on a global scale.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Science, Radboud University Nijmegen , Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2014 May 6;48(9):5282-9. doi: 10.1021/es500757p. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1021/es500757p
PMID:24749645
Abstract

One of the major challenges in life cycle assessment (LCA) is the availability and quality of data used to develop models and to make appropriate recommendations. Approximations and assumptions are often made if appropriate data are not readily available. However, these proxies may introduce uncertainty into the results. A regression model framework may be employed to assess missing data in LCAs of products and processes. In this study, we develop such a regression-based framework to estimate CO2 emission factors associated with coal power plants in the absence of reported data. Our framework hypothesizes that emissions from coal power plants can be explained by plant-specific factors (predictors) that include steam pressure, total capacity, plant age, fuel type, and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of the resident nations of those plants. Using reported emission data for 444 plants worldwide, plant level CO2 emission factors were fitted to the selected predictors by a multiple linear regression model and a local linear regression model. The validated models were then applied to 764 coal power plants worldwide, for which no reported data were available. Cumulatively, available reported data and our predictions together account for 74% of the total world's coal-fired power generation capacity.

摘要

在生命周期评估(LCA)中,主要挑战之一是用于开发模型和提出适当建议的数据的可用性和质量。如果没有适当的数据,通常会进行近似和假设。但是,这些代理可能会给结果带来不确定性。可以采用回归模型框架来评估产品和工艺的 LCA 中缺失的数据。在这项研究中,我们开发了这样一个基于回归的框架,以在没有报告数据的情况下估算与燃煤电厂相关的 CO2 排放因子。我们的框架假设可以通过包括蒸汽压力、总容量、电厂年龄、燃料类型和电厂所在国家/地区的人均国内生产总值(GDP)在内的特定于电厂的因素(预测因素)来解释燃煤电厂的排放。使用全球 444 个电厂的报告排放数据,通过多元线性回归模型和局部线性回归模型将电厂级别的 CO2 排放因子拟合到选定的预测因素上。然后,将经过验证的模型应用于全球 764 个没有报告数据的燃煤电厂。总的来说,可用的报告数据和我们的预测共同占全球燃煤发电总容量的 74%。

相似文献

1
How to address data gaps in life cycle inventories: a case study on estimating CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity plants on a global scale.如何解决生命周期清单中的数据空白问题:以全球范围内估算燃煤电厂 CO2 排放为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 May 6;48(9):5282-9. doi: 10.1021/es500757p. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
2
Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.印度发电厂燃煤产生的二氧化碳、二氧化硫和一氧化氮排放的十年期排放估算。
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Oct;186(10):6857-66. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3894-3. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
3
Determinants of technical inefficiency in China's coal-fired power plants and policy recommendations for CO mitigation.中国燃煤电厂技术效率低下的决定因素及 CO 减排的政策建议。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):52064-52081. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14394-4. Epub 2021 May 17.
4
Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.通过油页岩掺烧和生物炭固存实现燃煤电厂的超低碳排放量。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Dec 15;49(24):14688-95. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03548. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
A decision analysis model for reducing carbon emission from coal-fired power plants and its compensatory units.减少燃煤电厂及其补偿机组碳排放的决策分析模型。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113829. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113829. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
6
Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.火电厂二氧化碳排放绩效标准的用水影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 21;48(20):11769-76. doi: 10.1021/es502896z. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
7
Water-carbon trade-off in China's coal power industry.中国煤炭电力行业的水-碳权衡。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 7;48(19):11082-9. doi: 10.1021/es5026454. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
8
Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.海上风力发电有机会减少中国未来对燃煤电厂的需求,从而减少二氧化碳排放。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Dec 16;48(24):14764-71. doi: 10.1021/es503767x. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
The environmental effect of capacity utilization in thermal power plants: evidence from interprovincial carbon emissions in China.火力发电厂产能利用率的环境效应:来自中国省际碳排放的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Oct;26(29):30399-30412. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06251-2. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
10
Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.近期天然气价格下降对美国电力部门二氧化碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 6;46(5):3014-21. doi: 10.1021/es203750k. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Global site-specific health impacts of fossil energy, steel mills, oil refineries and cement plants.化石能源、钢铁厂、炼油厂和水泥厂对全球特定地点的健康影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38075-z.
2
Estimates of carbon dioxide emissions based on incomplete condition information: a case study of liquefied natural gas in China.基于不完全条件信息的二氧化碳排放量估算:以中国液化天然气为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(9):8847-8861. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04391-z. Epub 2019 Feb 4.