• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知平均值判断中的样本量偏差。

Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.

作者信息

Price Paul C, Kimura Nicole M, Smith Andrew R, Marshall Lindsay D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno.

Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1321-31. doi: 10.1037/a0036576. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1037/a0036576
PMID:24749965
Abstract

Previous research has shown that people exhibit a sample size bias when judging the average of a set of stimuli on a single dimension. The more stimuli there are in the set, the greater people judge the average to be. This effect has been demonstrated reliably for judgments of the average likelihood that groups of people will experience negative, positive, and neutral events (Price, 2001; Price, Smith, & Lench, 2006) and also for estimates of the mean of sets of numbers (Smith & Price, 2010). The present research focuses on whether this effect is observed for judgments of average on a perceptual dimension. In 5 experiments we show that people's judgments of the average size of the squares in a set increase as the number of squares in the set increases. This effect occurs regardless of whether the squares in each set are presented simultaneously or sequentially; whether the squares in each set are different sizes or all the same size; and whether the response is a rating of size, an estimate of area, or a comparative judgment. These results are consistent with a priming account of the sample size bias, in which the sample size activates a representation of magnitude that directly biases the judgment of average.

摘要

先前的研究表明,人们在判断一组单一维度刺激的平均值时会表现出样本量偏差。集合中的刺激越多,人们判断的平均值就越大。这种效应在对人群经历负面、正面和中性事件的平均可能性的判断中得到了可靠的证明(普赖斯,2001年;普赖斯、史密斯和伦奇,2006年),在对数字集合平均值的估计中也得到了证明(史密斯和普赖斯,2010年)。本研究关注的是在感知维度上对平均值的判断是否会观察到这种效应。在5个实验中,我们表明,随着集合中方块数量的增加,人们对集合中方块平均大小的判断也会增加。无论每个集合中的方块是同时呈现还是依次呈现;无论每个集合中的方块大小不同还是全部相同;以及无论反应是大小评级、面积估计还是比较判断,这种效应都会出现。这些结果与样本量偏差的启动解释一致,在这种解释中,样本量激活了一个大小表征,该表征直接使平均值的判断产生偏差。

相似文献

1
Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.感知平均值判断中的样本量偏差。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Sep;40(5):1321-31. doi: 10.1037/a0036576. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
2
Sample size bias in retrospective estimates of average duration.平均病程回顾性估计中的样本量偏差。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 May;176:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Sample size bias in the estimation of means.均数估计的样本量偏倚。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):499-503. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.499.
4
Statistical processing: computing the average size in perceptual groups.统计处理:计算感知组中的平均大小。
Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(7):891-900. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.004.
5
Obligatory averaging in mean size perception.平均大小感知中的强制平均。
Vision Res. 2014 Aug;101:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 22.
6
The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: the more, the riskier.目标群体规模对风险判断和比较性乐观的影响:群体越大,风险越高。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):382-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.382.
7
Ensemble representations: effects of set size and item heterogeneity on average size perception.集合表征:集合大小和项目异质性对平均大小感知的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Feb;142(2):245-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.002. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
8
Egocentric biases in comparative volume judgments of rooms.房间比较体积判断中的自我中心偏差。
J Vis. 2016;16(6):2. doi: 10.1167/16.6.2.
9
Body-scaled perception is subjected to adaptation when repetitively judging opportunities for grasping.当反复判断抓握机会时,身体尺度感知会发生适应性变化。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2731-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4677-6. Epub 2016 May 24.
10
How can observers use perceived size? Centroid versus mean-size judgments.观察者如何使用感知大小?质心与平均大小判断。
J Vis. 2019 Mar 1;19(3):3. doi: 10.1167/19.3.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast Effect of Facial Attractiveness in Groups.群体中面部吸引力的对比效应。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 15;11:2258. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02258. eCollection 2020.
2
Are Individuals Perceived as More Attractive within a Group? A Confirmative Study of Group Attractiveness Effect and the Cheerleader Effect in China.个体在群体中会被认为更具吸引力吗?一项关于群体吸引力效应和中国啦啦队效应的实证研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;8(3):344. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030344.
3
Roles of saliency and set size in ensemble averaging.显著性和集合大小在整体平均中的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1251-1262. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02089-w.
4
Exaggerated groups: amplification in ensemble coding of temporal and spatial features.夸大组:在时间和空间特征的集合编码中放大。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 30;285(1879). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2770.
5
The development of perceptual averaging: learning what to do, not just how to do it.感知平均化的发展:学习做什么,而不仅仅是如何去做。
Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12584. doi: 10.1111/desc.12584. Epub 2017 Aug 15.