Chen I-Hsuan, Tsai Jeng-Yu, Yu Chia-Cheng, Wu Tony, Huang Jong-Khing, Lin Jen-Tai
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014 May;30(5):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of ureteroscope-assisted double-J stenting following laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and to evaluate the effects of retrograde ureteroscopic access exerted on the sutured ureterotomy site. From January 2002 to December 2011, 30 patients with proximal ureteral stone underwent ureteroscopic double-J stenting of the ureter following retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy. Patient demographics and perioperative parameters, including the degree of hydronephrosis, urine leakage, and drainage time, were retrospectively reviewed. These data were compared with those of 30 consecutive patients who received open ureterolithotomy and intracorporeal ureteral double-J stenting. In addition, a PubMed search was conducted and the related literature on the placement of a ureteral stent was reviewed. Twenty-eight patients successfully underwent ureteral double-J stenting with ureteroscopic access. No malposition of the ureteral stent was identified in the ureteroscopic group, but two patients in the intracorporeal group required postoperative adjustment of the stent. Residual stone fragments were found during stent placement in three patients in the ureteroscopic group and holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy was immediately performed. There was no significant difference in postoperative outcomes or complication rates between the two groups. Ureteroscope-assisted ureteral double-J stenting is a simple and safe alternative allowing intraluminal navigation along the entire ureter, correct stent placement, and prompt treatment of residual stone fragments, without radiation exposure. In addition, ureteral disruption and urinary extravasation may not be concerns for ureteroscopic access with continuous normal saline irrigation.
本研究的目的是探讨腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术后输尿管镜辅助双J管置入的可行性,并评估逆行输尿管镜通路对输尿管切开缝合部位的影响。2002年1月至2011年12月,30例输尿管上段结石患者在腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术后接受输尿管镜双J管置入术。回顾性分析患者的人口统计学资料和围手术期参数,包括肾积水程度、尿漏和引流时间。将这些数据与30例接受开放输尿管切开取石术和体内输尿管双J管置入术的连续患者的数据进行比较。此外,还进行了PubMed检索并复习了输尿管支架置入的相关文献。28例患者通过输尿管镜通路成功进行了输尿管双J管置入。输尿管镜组未发现输尿管支架位置异常,但体内组有2例患者术后需要调整支架。输尿管镜组有3例患者在置入支架时发现残留结石碎片,并立即进行了钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术。两组术后结果和并发症发生率无显著差异。输尿管镜辅助输尿管双J管置入是一种简单安全的替代方法,可沿整个输尿管进行腔内导航、正确放置支架并及时处理残留结石碎片,且无辐射暴露。此外,对于持续生理盐水冲洗的输尿管镜通路,输尿管破裂和尿外渗可能不是问题。