Lewis Sarah C, Li Lingling, Murphy Michael V, Klompas Michael
1Division of Infectious Disease, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. 2Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA. 3Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1839-48. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000338.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently released new surveillance definitions for ventilator-associated events, including the new entities of ventilator-associated conditions and infection-related ventilator-associated complications. Both ventilator-associated conditions and infection-related ventilator-associated complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital death, but little is known about their risk factors and how best to prevent them. We sought to identify risk factors for ventilator-associated conditions and infection-related ventilator-associated complications.
Retrospective case-control study.
Medical, surgical, cardiac, and neuroscience units of a tertiary care teaching hospital.
Hundred ten patients with ventilator-associated conditions matched to 110 controls without ventilator-associated conditions on the basis of age, sex, ICU type, comorbidities, and duration of mechanical ventilation prior to ventilator-associated conditions.
None.
We compared cases with controls with regard to demographics, comorbidities, ventilator bundle adherence rates, sedative exposures, routes of nutrition, blood products, fluid balance, and modes of ventilatory support. We repeated the analysis for the subset of patients with infection-related ventilator-associated complications and their controls.
Case and control patients were well matched on baseline characteristics. On multivariable logistic regression, significant risk factors for ventilator-associated conditions were mandatory modes of ventilation (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.6-8.0) and positive fluid balances (odds ratio, 1.2 per L positive; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4). Possible risk factors for infection-related ventilator-associated complications were starting benzodiazepines prior to intubation (odds ratio, 5.0; 95% CI, 1.3-29), total opioid exposures (odds ratio, 3.3 per 100 μg fentanyl equivalent/kg; 95% CI, 0.90-16), and paralytic medications (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.79-80). Traditional ventilator bundle elements, including semirecumbent positioning, oral care with chlorhexidine, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, daily spontaneous breathing trials, and sedative interruptions, were not associated with ventilator-associated conditions or infection-related ventilator-associated complications.
Mandatory modes of ventilation and positive fluid balance are risk factors for ventilator-associated conditions. Benzodiazepines, opioids, and paralytic medications are possible risk factors for infection-related ventilator-associated complications. Prospective studies are needed to determine if targeting these risk factors can lower ventilator-associated condition and infection-related ventilator-associated complication rates.
美国疾病控制与预防中心最近发布了呼吸机相关事件的新监测定义,包括呼吸机相关状况和感染相关呼吸机相关并发症等新实体。呼吸机相关状况和感染相关呼吸机相关并发症均与机械通气时间延长和医院死亡相关,但对其危险因素以及如何最佳预防它们却知之甚少。我们试图确定呼吸机相关状况和感染相关呼吸机相关并发症的危险因素。
回顾性病例对照研究。
一家三级护理教学医院的内科、外科、心脏科和神经科病房。
110例患有呼吸机相关状况的患者与110例无呼吸机相关状况的对照者进行匹配,匹配因素包括年龄、性别、重症监护病房类型、合并症以及出现呼吸机相关状况之前的机械通气时间。
无。
我们比较了病例组和对照组在人口统计学、合并症、呼吸机集束依从率、镇静剂使用情况、营养途径、血液制品、液体平衡以及通气支持模式等方面的情况。我们对感染相关呼吸机相关并发症患者及其对照者的亚组重复了该分析。
病例组和对照组患者在基线特征方面匹配良好。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,呼吸机相关状况的显著危险因素为强制通气模式(比值比,3.4;95%可信区间,1.6 - 8.0)和液体正平衡(每升正平衡的比值比为1.2;95%可信区间,1.0 - 1.4)。感染相关呼吸机相关并发症的可能危险因素为插管前开始使用苯二氮䓬类药物(比值比,5.0;95%可信区间,1.3 - 29)、阿片类药物总暴露量(每100μg芬太尼当量/千克的比值比为3.3;95%可信区间,0.90 - 16)以及使用麻痹性药物(比值比,2.3;95%可信区间,0.79 - 80)。传统的呼吸机集束要素,包括半卧位、用氯己定进行口腔护理、预防静脉血栓栓塞、预防应激性溃疡、每日进行自主呼吸试验以及中断镇静,与呼吸机相关状况或感染相关呼吸机相关并发症均无关。
强制通气模式和液体正平衡是呼吸机相关状况的危险因素。苯二氮䓬类药物、阿片类药物和麻痹性药物是感染相关呼吸机相关并发症的可能危险因素。需要进行前瞻性研究以确定针对这些危险因素是否能降低呼吸机相关状况和感染相关呼吸机相关并发症的发生率。