Emergency Intensive Care Unit, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Emergency Department, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jun;49(6):3000605211025130. doi: 10.1177/03000605211025130.
We aimed to compare the efficacy and risks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) versus histamine-2 receptor blocker (H2B) use for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients with sepsis and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).
In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III Clinical Database to identify critically ill adult patients with sepsis who had at least one risk factor for GIB and received either an H2B or PPI for ≥48 hours. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
After 1:1 PSM, 1056 patients were included in the H2B and PPI groups. The PPI group had higher in-hospital mortality (23.8% vs. 17.5%), GIB (8.9% vs. 1.6%), and pneumonia (49.6% vs. 41.6%) rates than the H2B group. After adjusting for risk factors of GIB and pneumonia, PPI use was associated with a 1.28-times increased risk of in-hospital mortality, 5.89-times increased risk of GIB, and 1.32-times increased risk of pneumonia.
Among critically ill adult patients with sepsis at risk for GIB, SUP with PPIs was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher risk of GIB and pneumonia than H2Bs.
我们旨在比较质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与组胺 2 受体阻滞剂(H2B)在预防有胃肠道出血(GIB)风险的脓毒症危重症患者应激性溃疡(SUP)中的疗效和风险。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用医疗信息集市重症监护 III 临床数据库,确定至少有一个 GIB 风险因素且接受 H2B 或 PPI 治疗≥48 小时的脓毒症危重症成年患者。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征。主要结局是院内死亡率。
经过 1:1 PSM,共有 1056 例患者纳入 H2B 和 PPI 组。PPI 组的院内死亡率(23.8%比 17.5%)、GIB(8.9%比 1.6%)和肺炎(49.6%比 41.6%)发生率均高于 H2B 组。在调整 GIB 和肺炎的危险因素后,PPI 使用与院内死亡率增加 1.28 倍、GIB 风险增加 5.89 倍和肺炎风险增加 1.32 倍相关。
在有 GIB 风险的脓毒症危重症成年患者中,与 H2B 相比,PPI 用于 SUP 与更高的院内死亡率以及更高的 GIB 和肺炎风险相关。