Suppr超能文献

胚胎干细胞和上胚层干细胞中静止复合体结合模式的比较。

A comparison of the rest complex binding patterns in embryonic stem cells and epiblast stem cells.

机构信息

Department of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Division of Stem Cell Therapy, Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21;9(4):e95374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095374. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

We detected and characterized the binding sites of the representative Rest complex components Rest, Sin3A, and Lsd1. We compared their binding patterns in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and epiblast stem (EpiS) cells. We found few Rest sites unique to the EpiS cells. The ES-unique site features were distinct from those of the common sites, namely, the signal intensities were weaker, and the characteristic gene function categories differed. Our analyses showed that the Rest binding sites do not always overlap with the Sin3A and Lsd1 binding sites. The Sin3A binding pattern differed remarkably between the ES and EpiS cells and was accompanied by significant changes in acetylated-histone patterns in the surrounding regions. A series of transcriptome analyses in the same cell types unexpectedly showed that the putative target gene transcript levels were not dramatically different despite dynamic changes in the Rest complex binding patterns and chromatin statuses, which suggests that Rest is not the sole determinant of repression at its targets. Nevertheless, we identified putative Rest targets with explicitly enhanced transcription upon Rest knock-down in 143 and 60 common and ES-unique Rest target genes, respectively. Among such sites, several genes are involved in ES cell proliferation. In addition, we also found that long, intergenic non-coding RNAs were apparent Rest targets and shared similar features with the protein-coding target genes. Interestingly, such non-coding target genes showed less conservation through evolution than protein-coding targets. As a result of differences in the components and targets of the Rest complex, its functional roles may differ in ES and EpiS cells.

摘要

我们检测并描绘了代表 Rest 复合物成分 Rest、Sin3A 和 Lsd1 的结合位点。我们比较了它们在小鼠胚胎干细胞(ES 细胞)和胚胎外胚层干细胞(EpiS 细胞)中的结合模式。我们发现,EpiS 细胞中仅有少量特有的 Rest 结合位点。ES 细胞特有的结合位点特征与共同结合位点不同,即信号强度较弱,特征基因功能类别不同。我们的分析表明,Rest 结合位点并不总是与 Sin3A 和 Lsd1 结合位点重叠。ES 细胞和 EpiS 细胞中 Sin3A 的结合模式差异显著,同时周围区域的组蛋白乙酰化模式也发生了显著变化。在相同细胞类型中进行的一系列转录组分析出人意料地表明,尽管 Rest 复合物结合模式和染色质状态发生了动态变化,但假定的靶基因转录本水平并没有明显差异,这表明 Rest 并非其靶基因抑制的唯一决定因素。然而,我们分别在 143 个和 60 个共同和 ES 细胞特有的 Rest 靶基因中鉴定出了在 Rest 敲低后转录明显增强的假定 Rest 靶基因。在这些位点中,有几个基因参与 ES 细胞增殖。此外,我们还发现长的、基因间非编码 RNA 是明显的 Rest 靶基因,并且与蛋白质编码靶基因具有相似的特征。有趣的是,这些非编码靶基因在进化过程中的保守性不如蛋白质编码靶基因。由于 Rest 复合物的组成和靶基因的不同,其功能作用在 ES 细胞和 EpiS 细胞中可能不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a932/3994037/a1b3e319defb/pone.0095374.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验