Davidsen Annika Helgadóttir, Poulsen Stig, Waaddegaard Mette, Lindschou Jane, Lau Marianne
Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Stolpegaardsvej 20, Gentofte 2820, Denmark.
Trials. 2014 Apr 23;15:138. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-138.
Continuous feedback on patient improvement and the therapeutic alliance may reduce the number of dropouts and increase patient outcome. There are, however, only three published randomized trials on the effect of feedback on the treatment of eating disorders, showing inconclusive results, and there are no randomized trials on the effect of feedback in group therapy. Accordingly the current randomized clinical trial, initiated in September 2012 at the outpatient clinic for eating disorders at Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, aims to investigate the impact of continuous feedback on attendance and outcome in group psychotherapy.
METHODS/DESIGN: The hypothesis is that continuous feedback to both patient and therapist on treatment progress and alliance will increase attendance and treatment outcome. The trial is set up using a randomized design with a minimum of 128 patients allocated to either an experimental or control group at a ratio of 1:1. The experimental group will receive standard treatment (systemic and narrative group psychotherapy) with feedback intervention, whereas the control group will receive standard treatment only. The participants are diagnosed with bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, or an eating disorder not otherwise specified, according to the DSM-IV. In the experimental group feedback to the participants, based on the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) and the Group Session Rating Scale (GSRS), is actively added to standard treatment. The ORS assesses areas of life functioning known to change as a result of therapeutic intervention. The GSRS assesses key dimensions of effective therapeutic relationships. In the control group, the patients fill out the Outcome Rating Scale only, and feedback is not provided.The primary outcome is the rate of attendance to treatment sessions. The secondary outcome is the severity of eating disorder symptoms. Exploratory outcomes are the level of psychological and social functioning, and suicide or self-harm. This is measured with the ORS, Symptom Check List, WHO-Five Wellbeing Index, Sheehan Disability Scale and a modified version of the Self-Harm Inventory.
If the results will confirm the hypothesis, this trial will support feedback as a way to improve group treatment attendance for outpatients with eating disorders.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01693237.
持续反馈患者的改善情况以及治疗联盟可能会减少退出治疗的人数并提高患者的治疗效果。然而,关于反馈对饮食失调治疗效果的随机试验仅有三项已发表,结果尚无定论,且尚无关于反馈在团体治疗中效果的随机试验。因此,于2012年9月在斯托尔佩加德心理治疗中心饮食失调门诊开展的这项随机临床试验,旨在研究持续反馈对团体心理治疗的出勤率和治疗效果的影响。
方法/设计:假设是对患者和治疗师持续反馈治疗进展和治疗联盟情况将提高出勤率和治疗效果。该试验采用随机设计,至少128名患者按1:1的比例分配到实验组或对照组。实验组将接受标准治疗(系统和叙事团体心理治疗)并辅以反馈干预,而对照组仅接受标准治疗。参与者根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版被诊断为神经性贪食症、暴饮暴食症或未另行规定的饮食失调症。在实验组中,基于结果评定量表(ORS)和团体治疗评定量表(GSRS)向参与者提供的反馈被积极添加到标准治疗中。ORS评估已知会因治疗干预而改变的生活功能领域。GSRS评估有效治疗关系的关键维度。在对照组中,患者仅填写结果评定量表,不提供反馈。主要结果是治疗课程的出勤率。次要结果是饮食失调症状的严重程度。探索性结果是心理和社会功能水平以及自杀或自我伤害情况。这通过ORS、症状清单、世界卫生组织五福安康指数、希恩残疾量表和自我伤害清单的修订版进行测量。
如果结果证实该假设,本试验将支持反馈作为提高饮食失调门诊患者团体治疗出勤率的一种方法。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01693237。