Suppr超能文献

双层氧化锆/氟磷灰石全瓷冠与整块式二硅酸锂全瓷冠的抗折性及折裂特征比较

Comparison of fracture resistance and fracture characterization of bilayered zirconia/fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate all ceramic crowns.

作者信息

Altamimi Abdulaziz M, Tripodakis Aris Petros, Eliades George, Hirayama Hiroshi

出版信息

Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Spring;9(1):98-110.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the fracture resistance between bilayered zirconia/ fluorapatite and monolithic lithium disilicate heat-pressed crowns and characterize the mode of fracture failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty crown samples were sequentially fitted on a mandibular right first molar metal replica of an ivory prepared molar tooth. The crown specimens were divided in three groups (A, B, and C; n = 10 for each group). Group A consisted of bilayered zirconia/fluorhapatite pressed-over crowns with standard design crown copings (0.7 mm uniform thickness), Group B of bilayered zirconia/fluorhapatite with anatomical design crown copings, and Group C of lithium disilicate monolithic crowns. The samples were then dynamically loaded under water for 100,000 cycles with a profile of 250 N maximum load at 1,000 N/s rate and 2.0 Hz frequency. Loading was performed with a steel ball (5 mm in diameter) coming into contact with the test crown, loading to maximum, holding for 0.2 s, unloading and lifting off 0.5 mm. The samples were then fractured under static loading, in order to determine the ultimate crown strength. Analysis of the recorded fracture load values was carried out with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey tests. Fractured specimens were examined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The fracture loads measured were (N, means and standard deviations): Group A: 561.87 (72.63), Group B: 1,014.16 (70.18) and Group C: 1,360.63 (77.95). All mean differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Catastrophic fractures occurred in Group C, whereas mainly veneer fractures were observed in Groups A and B.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the heat-pressed monolithic lithium-disilicate crowns showed more fracture resistance than zirconia/fluorapatite pressed-over crowns. Within the bilayered groups, the anatomical zirconia coping design presented increased ceramic fracture resistance.

摘要

目的

比较双层氧化锆/氟磷灰石冠和整体式热压二硅酸锂冠的抗折性能,并对骨折破坏模式进行表征。

材料与方法

将30个冠样本依次安装在一颗象牙制备磨牙的下颌右侧第一磨牙金属复制品上。将冠标本分为三组(A、B和C组;每组n = 10)。A组由具有标准设计冠内冠(均匀厚度0.7 mm)的双层氧化锆/氟磷灰石热压冠组成,B组由具有解剖学设计冠内冠的双层氧化锆/氟磷灰石组成,C组由二硅酸锂整体冠组成。然后将样本在水中动态加载100,000次循环,加载曲线为最大载荷250 N,加载速率为1,000 N/s,频率为2.0 Hz。使用直径5 mm的钢球与测试冠接触进行加载,加载至最大载荷,保持0.2 s,卸载并抬起0.5 mm。然后在静态加载下使样本断裂,以确定最终的冠强度。对记录的骨折载荷值进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA),然后进行Tukey检验。通过立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜检查断裂的标本。

结果

测得的骨折载荷为(N,平均值和标准差):A组:561.87(72.63),B组:1,014.16(70.18),C组:1,360.63(77.95)。所有平均差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。C组发生灾难性骨折,而A组和B组主要观察到贴面骨折。

结论

在本研究中,热压整体式二硅酸锂冠比氧化锆/氟磷灰石热压冠显示出更高的抗折性。在双层组中,解剖学氧化锆内冠设计提高了陶瓷的抗折性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验