Suppr超能文献

粪便微生物组生物样本采集方法的比较

Comparison of methods for fecal microbiome biospecimen collection.

作者信息

Dominianni Christine, Wu Jing, Hayes Richard B, Ahn Jiyoung

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

BMC Microbiol. 2014 Apr 23;14:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-103.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective means are needed to efficiently collect fecal samples for microbiome analysis in large-scale epidemiological studies. Using twenty-four fecal aliquots prepared from three healthy individuals, we compared the following four fecal sample collection methods for assessment of human gut microbiome: 1) fecal occult blood test cards, held at room temperature for three days, 2) Eppendorf tubes, at room temperature for three days, 3) Eppendorf tubes with RNAlater, at room temperature, and 4) as controls, samples immediately frozen at -80°C. The 24 samples were assayed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing to compare overall microbiome structure and taxon distributions according to collection method.

RESULTS

Storing fecal occult blood test card samples at room temperature for three days did not affect total DNA purity and relative 16S rRNA bacterial gene contents, compared with fresh frozen collection. Overall microbiome structure, based on phylogenetic UniFrac index, differed significantly by subject (p = 0.001), but microbiome structure (p = 0.497) and relative abundance of major microbial taxa (phyla) (p > 0.05) did not differ significantly by collection method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that low-cost fecal occult blood test card collection may be a feasible means of sample collection for fecal microbiome assessment in large-scale population-based studies.

摘要

背景

在大规模流行病学研究中,需要有效的方法来高效收集粪便样本以进行微生物组分析。我们使用从三名健康个体制备的24份粪便等分样本,比较了以下四种粪便样本收集方法对人类肠道微生物组的评估效果:1)粪便潜血检测卡,室温保存三天;2)艾本德管,室温保存三天;3)含有RNA保护剂的艾本德管,室温保存;4)作为对照,样本立即在-80°C冷冻。通过16S rRNA基因测序对这24个样本进行分析,以比较根据收集方法的总体微生物组结构和分类群分布。

结果

与新鲜冷冻收集相比,将粪便潜血检测卡样本在室温下保存三天不会影响总DNA纯度和相对16S rRNA细菌基因含量。基于系统发育UniFrac指数的总体微生物组结构因个体而异(p = 0.001),但微生物组结构(p = 0.497)和主要微生物分类群(门)的相对丰度(p>0.05)在不同收集方法之间没有显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,低成本的粪便潜血检测卡收集可能是大规模人群研究中粪便微生物组评估的一种可行的样本收集方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4acf/4005852/7a95de83494f/1471-2180-14-103-3.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验