Panda Ananya, Kumar Atin, Gamanagatti Shivanand, Bhalla Ashu Seith, Sharma Raju, Kumar Subodh, Mishra Biplab
Department of Radiology, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Radiology, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Acta Radiol. 2015 Apr;56(4):387-96. doi: 10.1177/0284185114529949. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
Blunt pancreatic trauma is an uncommon injury with high morbidity and mortality. Retrospective analyses of computed tomography (CT) performance report CT to have variable sensitivity in diagnosing pancreatic injury. Both a prospective analysis of multidetector CT (MDCT) performance and diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute blunt pancreatic injury remain unexplored.
To prospectively evaluate the utility of MDCT with MRI correlation in patients with blunt pancreatic trauma using intraoperative findings as the gold standard for analysis.
The contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans of patients admitted with blunt abdominal trauma were prospectively evaluated for CT signs of pancreatic injury. Patients detected to have pancreatic injury on CT were assigned a CT grade of injury according to American Association for Surgery of Trauma classification. MRI was performed in patients not undergoing immediate laparotomy and MRI grade independent of CT grade was assigned. Surgical grade was taken as gold standard and accuracy of CT and MRI for grading pancreatic injury and pancreatic ductal injury (PDI) was calculated. A quantitative and qualitative comparison of MRI was also done with CT to determine the performance of MRI in acute pancreatic injury.
Thirty out of 1198 patients with blunt trauma abdomen were detected to have pancreatic injury on CT, which was surgically confirmed in 24 patients. Seventeen underwent MRI and surgical correlation was available in 14 patients. CT and MRI correctly identified the grade of pancreatic injury in 91.7% (22/24) and 92.86% (13/14) patients, respectively. Both CT and MRI correctly identified PDI in 18/19 and 11/12 patients, respectively, with good inter-modality agreement of 88.9% (kappa value of 0.78). MRI also qualitatively added to the information provided by CT and increased diagnostic confidence in 58.8% of patients.
MDCT performs well in grading pancreatic injury and evaluating pancreatic ductal injury. MRI is useful in evaluation of acute pancreatic trauma as it can increase diagnostic confidence and provide more qualitative information regarding the extent of injury.
钝性胰腺创伤是一种不常见的损伤,发病率和死亡率都很高。对计算机断层扫描(CT)性能的回顾性分析报告称,CT在诊断胰腺损伤方面的敏感性各不相同。多排螺旋CT(MDCT)性能的前瞻性分析以及磁共振成像(MRI)在急性钝性胰腺损伤中的诊断效用仍未得到探索。
以前瞻性评估MDCT联合MRI对钝性胰腺创伤患者的效用,以术中发现作为分析的金标准。
对因钝性腹部创伤入院患者的增强CT(CECT)扫描进行前瞻性评估,以寻找胰腺损伤的CT征象。CT检查发现有胰腺损伤的患者,根据美国创伤外科学会分类法确定其CT损伤分级。未立即接受剖腹手术的患者进行MRI检查,并独立于CT分级确定MRI分级。以手术分级作为金标准,计算CT和MRI对胰腺损伤和胰管损伤(PDI)分级的准确性。还对MRI和CT进行了定量和定性比较,以确定MRI在急性胰腺损伤中的表现。
1198例钝性腹部创伤患者中,有30例经CT检查发现有胰腺损伤,其中24例经手术证实。17例患者接受了MRI检查,14例患者有手术相关性结果。CT和MRI分别在91.7%(22/24)和92.86%(13/14)的患者中正确识别了胰腺损伤分级。CT和MRI分别在18/19和11/12例患者中正确识别了PDI,两种检查方式之间的一致性良好,为88.9%(kappa值为0.78)。MRI在定性方面也补充了CT提供的信息,并使58.8%的患者诊断信心增强。
MDCT在胰腺损伤分级和评估胰管损伤方面表现良好。MRI对急性胰腺创伤的评估很有用,因为它可以增强诊断信心,并提供有关损伤程度的更多定性信息。