Keers Richard N, Williams Steven D, Cooke Jonathan, Walsh Tanya, Ashcroft Darren M
Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Research, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK,
Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):317-32. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0152-0.
There is a need to identify effective interventions to minimize the threat posed by medication administration errors (MAEs).
Our objective was to review and critically appraise interventions designed to reduce MAEs in the hospital setting.
Ten electronic databases were searched between 1985 and November 2013.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) reporting rates of MAEs or related adverse drug events between an intervention group and a comparator group were included. Data from each study were independently extracted and assessed for potential risk of bias by two authors. Risk ratios (RRs, with 95 % confidence intervals [CIs]) were used to examine the effect of an intervention.
Six RCTs and seven CTs were included. Types of interventions clustered around four main themes: medication use technology (n = 4); nurse education and training (n = 3); changing practice in anesthesia (n = 2); and ward system changes (n = 4). Reductions in MAE rates were reported by five studies; these included automated drug dispensing (RR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.53-1.00), computerized physician order entry (RR 0.51, 95 % 0.40-0.66), barcode-assisted medication administration with electronic administration records (RR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.53-0.95), nursing education/training using simulation (RR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.08-0.38), and clinical pharmacist-led training (RR 0.76, 95 % CI 0.67-0.87). Increased or equivocal outcome rates were found for the remaining studies. Weaknesses in the internal or external validity were apparent for most included studies.
Theses and conference proceedings were excluded and data produced outside commercial publishing were not searched.
There is emerging evidence of the impact of specific interventions to reduce MAEs in hospitals, which warrant further investigation using rigorous and standardized study designs. Theory-driven efforts to understand the underlying causes of MAEs may lead to more effective interventions in the future.
有必要确定有效的干预措施,以尽量减少用药错误(MAE)带来的威胁。
我们的目的是回顾并严格评估旨在减少医院环境中用药错误的干预措施。
检索了1985年至2013年11月期间的10个电子数据库。
纳入报告干预组与对照组之间用药错误率或相关药物不良事件发生率的随机对照试验(RCT)和对照试验(CT)。两位作者独立提取每项研究的数据,并评估其潜在的偏倚风险。采用风险比(RR,95%置信区间[CI])来检验干预效果。
纳入了6项RCT和7项CT。干预措施类型集中在四个主要主题:用药技术(n = 4);护士教育与培训(n = 3);改变麻醉实践(n = 2);病房系统改变(n = 4)。五项研究报告了用药错误率的降低;这些措施包括自动药品调配(RR 0.72,95%CI 0.53 - 1.00)、计算机化医嘱录入(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.40 - 0.66)、带有电子给药记录的条形码辅助给药(RR 0.71,95%CI 0.53 - 0.95)、使用模拟的护理教育/培训(RR 0.17,95%CI 0.08 - 0.38)以及临床药师主导的培训(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.67 - 0.8)。其余研究发现结果率增加或不明确。大多数纳入研究的内部或外部效度存在缺陷。
排除了学位论文和会议论文集,未检索商业出版之外产生的数据。
有新证据表明特定干预措施对减少医院用药错误有影响,这需要使用严格和标准化的研究设计进行进一步调查。理论驱动的努力以了解用药错误的根本原因可能会在未来带来更有效的干预措施。